Larger threat is seen in Google case
The verdict, though subject to appeal, could have sweeping implications worldwide for internet freedom: It suggests that Google is not simply a tool for its users, as it contends, but is effectively no different from any other media company, like newspapers or television, that provides content and could be regulated. Ay, carumba.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/technology/companies/25google.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/technology/companies/25google.html
Previous 10
|
Next 10
About this Blog
When three Google executives were convicted of violating Italian privacy laws, it was the first case to hold the company’s executives criminally responsible for the content posted on its system.
ADVERTISEMENT
Other Blogs
TV
- Living Black
- Italian Food Safari
- Thalassa
- Luke Nguyen's Vietnam
- Behind the Scenes: The 2009 Deadly Awards
- My Family Feast
- Costa's Production Blog
- Eurovision 2011
- Swift and Shift Couriers
- Global Village
- My Bogan Diary
- The Road to the White House
Food
Films
Documentary
- Britt Arthur
- Catharine Lumby
- John Birmingham
- Rory Medcalf
- Mark Jones
- Emily Booth
- Bob Wurth
- Andy Martin
World News Australia
- Ricardo's Business
- 180 degrees
- Reporters' Blog
- The Hashtag
- The Other World Game
- Window on Africa
- Pop, Cultured
- PJ's Notebook
- The Sweet Spot
- Back of the.net
- Source Code
- The Road to 2012
- Candid Canberra
Sport
- The Circus
- The Interchange
- The Hangover
- Lip Service
- Deep in the Dust: On the Dakar trail
- Dakar Dreams
- The Finktank
- Open Season
About SBS
Business
Internet and Technology
Cycling Central
- Rochelle Gilmore
- Matthew Price's Broom Wagon
- Anthony Tan's Velo Files
- Matthew Keenan
- Al Hinds
- Sophie Smith
- Philip Gomes
- Scott Sunderland
- Mike Tomalaris
Wed 23 May 2012 | 

