Most of Our Universe Is Missing
Sunday 27 July 8:30pm
Did you know we can only account for a tiny percentage of our universe – just 4% in fact? Scientists know this 4% consists of atoms, but what about the rest? Does ‘dark matter’ and ‘dark energy’ really fill the voids?
- 7 Comments | Join the discussion
Did you know we can only account for a tiny percentage of our universe – just 4% in fact? Scientists know this 4% consists of atoms, but what about the rest? Does ‘dark matter’ and ‘dark energy’ really fill the voids?
When Isaac Newton ‘discovered’ gravity, it was thought that all the mysteries of our universe were solved, until scientists in the 1970’s realised that the stars in our galaxy seemed to be unaffected by variable gravity. Princeton scientists Peebles and Ostriker concluded that ‘dark matter’ was the exception to Newton’s gravitational theory – a substance in the universe that had mass but did not interact with ordinary matter.
Meanwhile, another astrophysicist, Mordechai Milgrom, was trying to rewrite Newton’s laws of gravity. He called it Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and used it to show how gravity could be a little stronger than previously thought, across the huge distances that galaxies cover. His theories attracted a strong scientific following.
In the late 1990s another scientist, Saul Permutter, opened another can of worms. He noticed while looking at the expansion of the universe not only were all stars and galaxies moving away from each other, they were doing so at greater and greater speeds. Something had to be pushing the stars apart - an anti-gravity force which had never been discovered by science before called ‘dark energy’.
The Standard Model of the universe was based on these discoveries, and states that the universe is 4% ordinary matter (atoms), 21% dark matter and 75% dark energy. Although this model is generally accepted across the scientific community, it does have its skeptics too. Not everyone believes that such a huge and important set of theories can be based on so little physical evidence.
An epic intellectual battle has now ensued between dark matter believers and those who are unconvinced. Believers have created impressive computer simulations of the universe to show that dark matter and dark energy have been vital to the development of the Universe, and that without their influence the galaxies, stars, planets and even life itself would never have evolved. Cosmologists worldwide are on the trail of dark matter, searching deep space with satellites and plumbing the depths of mines.
In Most of Our Universe Is Missing we meet the scientists of the warring factions to get the story first hand. We visit the world’s most powerful telescopes, fly through outer space, tour a virtual ‘dark universe’ and travel to the Earth’s deepest mines to find out exactly what missing element is the backbone of the world as we know it.
Comments (7)
Dark matter?
It is about time to rethink our great theories. Revolutionary Newton's gravity theory was revolutionary about 400 years ago. It was in good agreement with the knowledge of physics at the time. Due to new observed fenomena it is more and more difficult to reconcile current knowledge with old theories. Instead of trying to patch them up, inventing dark matter or dark energy,scientists should try to find better (and simpler) explanation of the physics. Gravity is not caused by matter pulling matter
27 Jul 2008 17:26 AEST
From: NSW Central Coast
Standard Model fiction
The links did not get through. Trying again: http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-05-10.PDF and http://www.aias.us/.
27 Jul 2008 17:17 AEST
From: NSW Central Coast
Standard Model fiction
An Australian physicist has discovered fatal flaws at the very foundations of the 'Standard Model'. For the benefit of us all, he has written a plain language essay, see
27 Jul 2008 16:31 AEST
From: Hampton
Re: Truth Stranger than Fiction
Mark, You might want to re-read my earlier message, but this time armed with the knowledge I was being a tad facetious ;-)
27 Jul 2008 11:52 AEST
From: Blue Mountains
Truth Stranger than Fiction
Cam, at least scientific theory 'evolves' with what we know and what evidence great minds can discover. As for religion, an individual can easily change a 'pet' theory, they can just change religion. There are so many religious theories on how the universe was made , what makes you think your religious theory is the correct one? I suppose you can try an convince other indivivuals to convert to your relgous theory by force- I believe that is what they are doing in Sudan.
26 Jul 2008 19:58 AEST
From: Hampton
Re: Truth Stranger than Fiction
Quite right JOnathan, science is pretty radical. You'd never see religion disgarding a pet theory when evidence no longer supported it.
25 Jul 2008 15:46 AEST
From: Terrey Hills
Truth Stranger than Fiction
It wasn't long ago that Newtonian physics held sway and scientists thought the Universe consisted of imperishable atoms. How things change. Now it consists of something that we can't see, measure or comprehend. Science has gotten more far out than religion ever was.
Join the discussion
PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.
Most Popular
About this Blog
Documentaries portray powerful themes and critically engage with the SBS Charter, a principal function of which is to provide broadcast programs which reflect Australia's wonderfully diverse multicultural society.
Documentaries @ SBS provides you with all the latest documentaries news, previews and in depth information.
Fri 21 Nov 2008 | 
Watch Video
Podcasts
Blogs
Email to friend
Print
Enlarge text







top
Blog Home 

28 Jul 2008 14:12 AEST
Kris
From: kellyville