Getting to the bottom of the oil spill

25 May 2010 | 12:46 - By Matthew Hall

And so it continues. Over one long month since the Deepwater Horizon oil well blew out in the Gulf of Mexico sending, officials still argue over who is responsible. 

oil_spill_100525_getty_1537842550

Officials now say that it may be impossible to clean the hundreds of miles of coastal wetlands and islands affected. (Getty Images)

On Monday, in the usually sleepy coastal town of Galliano, Louisiana, federal government officials decided to call BP, who owned the well, a metaphorical taxi.

“We will keep our boot on their neck until the job gets done,” said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar told the Daily News.

“This is a BP mess. It is a horrible mess. It is a massive environmental mess.”

The oil giant, the fourth-largest company in the world, would be held accountable “both civilly and in whatever way is necessary and we will not rest until the job is done.

“Under the law,” said Salazar, “BP is the responsible party. BP is charged with capping their leaking oil well and paying for the response and for the recovery without limitation.”

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced at the press conference, intended to apply more public relations pressure on BP, that the government intended to see the oil company fulfill its moral and legal obligations.

“It’s not until this well is sealed and this ocean in this area is cleaned up and the claims repaid that this incident will be deemed over,” Napolitano said.

The message was relentless.

“We are going to stay on BP and stay on this until this gets done."

A day earlier, Salazar had visited BP’s US headquarters in Houston. From the sound of it, this would not have been a happy meeting.

“I am angry and I am frustrated that BP has been unable to stop this oil from leaking and to stop the pollution from spreading,” Salazar said afterwards.

“We are 33 days into this effort and deadline after deadline has been missed.”

Meanwhile, a week after Fox News panelist Brit Hume bizarrely asked on one news show “Oil – what oil?”, pretty much claiming there was no damage to coastal environments, the US Coast Guard announced 110 kilometres of shoreline were slicked and Louisiana’s marshlands, formerly rich pickings for commercial fishing, were indeed oiled.

YouTube: Where is the oil?

“This oil threatens not only our coast and our wetlands, this oil fundamentally threatens our way of life in southeastern Louisiana," said Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal.

Jindal, a Republican and once tipped as a possible challenger to President Obama, spoke at the same press conference as Salazar and Napolitano.

No doubt mindful of his local constituents, Jinadal used the platform to take pot shots at everyone involved in attempts to contain the spill, including the federal government reps standing next to him.

BP’s chief operating officer, Doug Suttles, responded to criticism with a comment that was probably true but only underlined how the situation has sadly ballooned out of control.

CNN: BP vows to clean every drop

“I don't think anyone else could do better than we are,” he said.

Which is a very valid point and possibly exactly the problem.

Share article: 
top

Comments (5)

14 Jun 2010 12:12 AEST

Greg

From: Sydney

Way of the future

There are many ocean drilling rigs about the planet and though technology has been developed, there have been problems in the past too. As global resources diminish against rising demands for oil, the possibility of equipment malfunctions and massive pollution is always present and risk increased by demand pressure.

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

01 Jun 2010 19:25 AEST

Jak Jones

From: Adeliade

Mr

I smell a rat. This oil spill is probably huge, bigger than they admit. Why is real data on it so hard to get

Agree (3 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

28 May 2010 19:52 AEST

helen

From: earlwood

deep water offshore drilling-Ban it

What I want to know is what kind of risk assessment was carried out for this activity in the first place?

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

28 May 2010 12:28 AEST

EM

From: Sydney

Responsibilities

Shouldn't BP be held responsible for the lack of effective, if any, safety and back-up plans? How can such a massive, risky operation go ahead without appropriate plans?

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

26 May 2010 8:10 AEST

kiki

From: Brisbane

What the ..

Why are these mining companies allowed to begin mining without a safety plan in place?

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

Join the discussion

You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.

About this Blog

Matthew Hall presents a first-hand look at world events from a different angle.

Matthew Hall New York-based writer Matthew Hall has chased fugitives across Texas, been shot in outback Australia and has lunched with Liza Minnelli.

 
ADVERTISEMENT