Robbie would’ve been there

10 October 2010 | 0:00 - By Anthony Tan

Based on precedent, his form leading to the Worlds, and what actually happened, Anthony Tan’s convinced the exclusion of Robbie McEwen may have cost Australia a rainbow jersey.

mcewen_310_aap_2119721419

Australia's Robbie McEwen (AAP)

When I saw how the under-23 men’s race eventuated at the UCI Road World Championships, I began to show concern.

Michael Matthews rode the perfect race, his sprint perfectly timed, and full credit to the soon-to-be Rabobank pro who has a future as bright as Sirius in front of him. But that 46 men were left in the front group after 10 laps of the Geelong circuit was contrary to earlier forecasts of a much smaller group contesting the medals.

Then on Saturday, one day later, when Nicole Cooke and Judith Arndt were caught in the final 500 metres of the elite women’s race, swamped by the trio of Giorgia Bronzini, Marianne Vos and Emma Johansson, I became more concerned.

Because to a large extent, for the 262.7 kilometre elite men’s race, the Australian selectors had banked on a finish unlike what the previous two days had seen.

If we go back to the selection announcement six weeks ago, Shayne Bannan, AIS Cycling Head Coach and National Performance Director, said Cadel Evans and Simon Gerrans would be undisputed leaders, and Matthew Goss and Allan Davis our “second-tier leaders”.

But on the non-selection of Robbie McEwen, all of the choices made the one that created the greatest public ignominy for fans of the triple Tour de France green jersey winner, Bannan said: “We felt, at this stage, on this course, Goss and Davis provided better options than Robbie. It was certainly a difficult decision but [it] was based on the course – we felt it is too difficult for him, and we had better options in Goss and Davis.”

After viewing the course myself 12 months ago, I accepted Bannan’s reasoning on the exclusion of McEwen. But what I should’ve asked our chief selector was this: “Had there been instances where, in a major one-day race or sprint stage of a Grand Tour, Goss and Davis contested a sprint finish and McEwen had not; that is, where he’d been dropped?”

Because this was really what Bannan was saying – that should the men’s race end in a semblance of a sprint, he felt Goss and Davis would have a better chance of being there than McEwen.

This week, I asked McEwen the same question.

“Um, no. One day races, we’re [all] similar in ability,” he said.

“When it comes to one-day races, Paris-Brussels, Gossy’s won it – I’ve won it five times; Allan’s finished second. I’ve won Hamburg [now called the Vattenfall Cyclassics] – Allan finished third on that occasion [2008]. We’re of similar ability… When it gets difficult, we come into difficulty at about the same time, if we’re in the same sort of form.

“And for a world championships,” McEwen added, “I definitely would’ve got myself into that same sort of form. I truly believe I could’ve done a good job there. But, it’s the selectors and coaches that chose for other guys, and I felt really let down by that.”

As it turned out that first Sunday in October, despite the best efforts of outstanding pre-race favourite Philippe Gilbert and defending champ Evans, a 25-man group did contest the finish. Goss wasn’t there, Davis was.

And while I’m reluctant to take anything away from Alby Davis, whose third place was his best-ever result at a road world championship, I can’t help but wonder whether Robbie would have been there, and if he had, where would he have been?

“Like I said, when I previewed the course back in January, I said: ‘Okay, the hills are quite hard – they’re steep – but they’re not that long, so you’ll never get gapped off by much. And I expected a group to be together, something like Madrid, Salzburg – and in the end, it was pretty much like Madrid; a group of 30 guys,” McEwen said.

Now, it should be noted that in 2005 in Madrid, McEwen and Alessandro Petacchi were the two big favourites, but the pair – as well as Erik Zabel – did not finish in the front group of 23, although in Tom Boonen, a sprinter did triumph.

Also in Geelong, Mark Cavendish pulled the pin early in the peace and Tyler Farrar finished almost 14 minutes down on the eventual winner, Thor Hushovd, so whether McEwen would have made it to the finish is a point of conjecture.

But what was not under debate was McEwen’s form leading to the Worlds, which was improving all the time.

Most significant – and the one I thought was the deal-breaker that would guarantee him a place in the Australian Worlds team – was his stage win at the Eneco Tour on August 18, where in the Dutch town of Rhenen – and on an uphill sprint finish of 600 metres, no less – McEwen returned from the pain and disappointment suffered at the Tour de France to clinch a hard-fought victory against Lucas Sebastian Haedo and… Allan Davis.

A prolific Tweeter, Robbie’s first post-victory Tweet was thus: “Feels good to b back in the winners circle! ProTour win, stg 1 of Eneco Tour, uphill finish. Form on the up. Enough 4 worlds selection now?”

Unfortunately, not.

“I still believe there should’ve been a place there for myself,” McEwen told me, “because it came down to a group where, had I been in top form at the Worlds – which is what I was aiming to do, before I was not selected six weeks out – I think I could’ve had a chance of winning a world title or winning a medal.

“In the end, they won a medal with Allan so… you can’t say they made a bad selection. But I think they could’ve made a better selection because I think they selected a couple of guys on the basis of thinking that they’d be work to be done in that first 90k – and there just wasn’t – and then they couldn’t play a role once they got to the circuit.

“But that’s a chance that they took,” he said.

I asked McEwen: “Will you ever be able to get over something like this, and if so, how long will it take?”

Before answering, he let out a massive sigh; something that I gathered had been welling up inside of him ever since he saw the Worlds end in a sprint finish.

“Well, if I can keep going on and be in good form and ride next year’s Worlds in Copenhagen, and get a good result, it might be some consolation. But basically, any Worlds you miss, it’s a missed opportunity – you never get that back. Particularly a Worlds in Australia – I’ll never have that opportunity again.”

And Australia may never again have the opportunity to crown a home-grown world champion in their own backyard.

Share article: 
top

Comments (12)

Display: 20 | 40 | All comments per page
Previous 10 | Page 1 | 2 | Next 10

26 May 2011 11:49 AEST

oakleys uk

From: USA

--

Robbie would not have made it to the end. but i love him!!!!

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

14 Oct 2010 8:34 AEST

Danny

From: Coniston

--

Copenhagen will be suited for Robbie in 2011.Just like Zolder when he got 2nd against the fastest sprinters in the world. Australia has a host of good sprinters but not prolific sprinters. Robbie has the runs on the board regardless of age.He was definitely hard done by in the selection. If anyone takes the time to look at the pre form guide of Stuey and Cookie they would have noticed that they were getting dropped in stages of a small stage race in France just before the worlds. Hardly a good indicator of form to deliver Matt Goss and Alby to the win in Geelong.Robbie could have equally contributed as a domestique. The selectors got it wrong. But they will never admit it.The 3 biggest nations had the most to gain with large teams and a better spread of riders and they all stuffed it up by banking on a rouleur for the Win.Belgium,Australia and Italy stuffed up bad by not taking a top line sprinter.Gilbert would have won I reckon if he would have rode negative and waited for a sprint. Robbies problems next year will be documented with his team not getting top line starts in big races. Th selectors will use that against him next year.

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (2 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Oct 2010 21:46 AEST

Andrew

From: australia

--

Robbie would not have made it to the end. Alby this year easily out climbs Robbie. Biggest mistake made by the selectors was leaving out Richie Porte. At the business end of the race Cadel was on his own, with Richie there Cadel would have been a lot more effective when it mattered. What other national could afford to leave off the 4th best TT rider in the world. Did not make any sense. He climbs and TT's with the best.

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Oct 2010 12:24 AEST

Ben

From: Melbourne

--

Slow news week at SBS? This not news and not worth writing about.

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (6 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Oct 2010 11:25 AEST

Rob

From: Hampton

--

Good article................Fair opinion............But we'll never know. Anthony...................just let it go!

Agree (8 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Oct 2010 11:07 AEST

David

From: Newcastle

--

Gee Tan Man. In your previous blog you said you were happy with the World's team selected and now after the fact you have changed your tune? Monday's expert perhaps? What pure sprinters were left at the finish anyway? It was a classics style race won by a classics rider. If you cast your mind back to January Robbie and others were complaining about the national course in buninyong being too hard and wanted a spinters course. You should also show a bit more respect towards what Allan Davis acheived with a bronze medal.

Agree (7 people agree)    Disagree (2 people disagree) Report this
 

11 Oct 2010 12:09 AEST

snappy don

From: Adel

--

Pot stirrer.. The selectors were probably not far off the mark in their assessment that the course was too difficult to expect a sprinter to win. On the day, my theory is that the course intimidated the peloton. They looked at the climbs, multiplied it by the number of laps, and for the most part rode within themselves and held something back for the end. So yeah, as it turned out, Robbie could have done well..

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (4 people disagree) Report this
 

11 Oct 2010 11:52 AEST

Nicky B

From: Geelong

--

Think you might be right tan man. Initially didn't think Robbie should have got a spot in the team but Robbie over Cooke any day. If he didn't have the legs on the day with Robbies experience he would have done as good a domestic role as Stuey did.

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (11 people disagree) Report this
 

10 Oct 2010 23:42 AEST

Rachel

From: Sydney

--

Difference is you pick mcewen and he didnt have the legs on that course could/would he be as good a domestique as the others? all 9 played their part and Evans and Davis were looked after perfectly. Goss struggled but he helped out as long as he could. I think if they picked mcewen and alby and he didnt end up in sprint -mcewen dropped early- you'd be writing a post about why mcewen was picked.

Agree (11 people agree)    Disagree (1 people disagree) Report this
 

10 Oct 2010 22:51 AEST

Andy

From: Sydney

--

As much as I would have loved Robbie to win, If Gossy wasnt there then Robbie wouldnt have been either. Gossy won Plouay a few weeks earlier which proved he could climb and confirmed he was a better pick than Robbie. Alby over the past year has developed into a far better climber than Robbie and fit into a different role than he would have anyway. The difference between bronze and gold was just choosing the wrong wheel to follow in the finale - not the selectors omission of Robbie.

Agree (11 people agree)    Disagree (1 people disagree) Report this
 
Display: 20 | 40 | All comments per page
Previous 10 | Page 1 | 2 | Next 10

Join the discussion

You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.