When slow is good

12 March 2011 | 0:00 - By Matthew Keenan

For Matthew Keenan, the quality and speed of racing at Paris-Nice is evidence the fight against doping is working.

Martin_310_app_pn_698107243

German national time trial champion Tony Martin currently leads the 2011 Paris-Nice. Photo: AAP

Like a moth to a flame cycling media, fans and officials are drawn to a doping story. Better yet a doping saga.

Yet when discussing the topic with non-cycling people many of us, myself included, often defend our sport with phrases like “at least we’re catching the cheats” or “at least we’re doing something about it unlike… insert your sport of choice here.”

Among the common phrases used by the administrators of cycling, and of just about any sport for the that matter, is that each cheat who is caught is evidence that “we’re winning the war on drugs.”

If it really was a war and all the sports of the world were lining up off the coast of Normandy on D-Day cycling would be the first u-boat onto the beach. And while we’re taking the lion’s share of the casualties the other sports are sitting back and waiting to assess the damage before committing their troops.

With this analogy in mind it’s ironic that the German’s are the ones running for cover from cycling with reduced television coverage because of doping. Let’s not even discuss their record, particularly the East Germans.

This fascination with doping is partly because like the damage done by an unfaithful partner the trust has been broken and we’re often second-guessing the sport we love.

Even though everyone should be judged innocent until proven guilty, most of us have, at least occasionally, privately questioned surprising results. Like a pure climber delivering a better than expect performance in a time trial or a sprinter surviving some mountain passes ahead of known climbers.

With all the talk about doping I think I’ve developed a nervous twitch on the subject. So much so that after seeing an aggressive first stage of Paris-Nice finish 30-minutes behind schedule I declared this a good thing for cycling’s reputation. Then the following three stages were also behind schedule.

Yet it has been incredibly entertaining racing.

The breakaway got under the radar on stage one for a surprise Thomas De Gendt victory. Greg Henderson won a textbook sprint finish on stage two. Matt Goss took stage three, plus the yellow jersey, following Peter Sagan’s dramatic crash on the last corner. De Gendt then went in the break on stage four to regain the overall lead while Thomas Voeckler claimed the stage honours. Followed by Andreas Kloden, somehow, beating Samuel Sanchez to the line on stage five and becoming the new owner of the yellow jersey. Only to have Tony Martin win the stage six time trial for yet another change in race leadership as he moves to the top of the table.

The quality of the racing at the slower than expected speed has given me some hope that maybe we really are making progress.

I know we’ll never completely win the “war on drugs” just as there’ll always be crime in the rest of society. But just as crime must always be policed, even though it will never be eradicated, so too the battle to catch the cheats must continue.

My anti-doping utopia is to be free of the second-guessing and comfortably believe the results I see, unless of course a positive test is returned.

Could the anti-doping technology ever really get that far ahead of the game? I hope so.

Share article: 
top

Comments (6)

15 Mar 2011 9:58 AEST

Dan

From: Melbourne

--

I like the analogy about landing U-Boats on the beaches at Normandy, just the sort of bizarre, inconsistent, and just plain messed-up decision that the people running cycling and the battle against drugs seem to be so very good at making! If the administration of cycling could just get its head around how to manage the processes involved properly (and communicate consistently about them) the sport would start to look cleaner pretty quickly. As it is, well, we've got what we've got.

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

14 Mar 2011 17:17 AEST

Chris

From: Sydney

--

What intrigues me is the way the governing bodies ummm and aahh then change their minds then drop the charge. There is no continuity in dealing with the doping once it is discovered. All my non-cycling friends are not surprized about doping in cycling. It seems to be part of the luggage.... shame

Agree (1 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

13 Mar 2011 22:11 AEST

Matt Keenan

From: Paris-Nice

--

According to RadioShack, Andreas Kloden has been tested 8 times in 7 days. At the very least there is no shortage of effort on the anti-doping front.

Agree (20 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Mar 2011 21:10 AEST

mary

From: rosanna

--

I was standing at the finish line last year at the world championships time trial in geelong waiting for the racing to start. I had a arrived early to get a good spot and life was good. At around 1pm my husband phone me with the news that contador had been found with small traces of a drug. i turned to the fans around me and not one of us was surprised by the news. we all felt pretty discouraged about the fact that such a great cyclist was a doper. i deliberated folding up my chair, getting on the train to return to melbourne... and then the racing started. it was a magnificent day. i wish the doping would stop. i don't know if i can keep loving the cycling if the doping doesn't stop. My family and friends laugh at me for insisting on continuing with my passion for cycling when so many are cheats.

Agree (9 people agree)    Disagree (6 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Mar 2011 20:23 AEST

Peter Pedantic

From: Adelaide

--

Interesting article and I hope you are right about doping, but I think you mean landing barges at Normandy, not u-boats.

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Mar 2011 14:35 AEST

TownRider

From: Sydney

--

30mins of slowing and "exciting" racing by the whole peloton is no "no-dope" effect. It's just staged action against proposed radio ban!

Agree (2 people agree)    Disagree (33 people disagree) Report this
 

Join the discussion

You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.