Back to the Omega Pharma future

01 July 2011 | 0:00 - By Matthew Keenan

After Cadel Evans claimed fourth at the 2006 Tour de France there was plenty of criticism, within Australian quarters at least, of his team’s lack of willingness to build the team solely around his yellow jersey ambitions.

vandenbroeck_640_aap_2118115735

Jurgen Van den Broeck, Omega Pharma-Lotto (AAP)

After Cadel Evans claimed fourth at the 2006 Tour de France there was plenty of criticism, within Australian quarters at least, of his team’s lack of willingness to build the team solely around his yellow jersey ambitions.

Much of this criticism stemmed from a belief that being Australian was working against Evans in an old fashioned Belgian team. A look at the hedging their bets approach of Omega Pharma-Lotto at this year’s Tour can put this belief to rest.

Spearheading Omega Pharma-Lotto’s tilt at the general classification this year is Jurgen Van den Broeck.

Following his fifth place finish last year he is now, at 28 and in the prime of his career, among the contenders for a podium finish. Something no one from cycling mad Belgium has achieved since Lucien van Impe in 1981.

Working against Van den Broeck is the structure of the team. It will be contending for Tour success on a number of fronts, just as it did with the double headed Evans-McEwen approach when they were both at the team.

With Philippe Gilbert on the team they have one of the favourites for the first yellow jersey.

Gilbert’s 2011 form should result in the team doing a fair portion of work on the first stage, with its uphill finish, to give him every chance of stage honours and the race lead.

Unfortunately for Van den Broeck this will cost the team valuable energy heading into the stage two team time trial, potentially costing him time he can’t afford to lose.

The race then provides a few opportunities for the sprinters where Andre Greipel, the third prong in the Omega Pharma-Lotto attack, will be the protected man.

Greipel is making his Tour debut and will be among the challengers to Mark Cavendish when the sprinters rub elbows. But he won’t be able to beat Cavendish on his own. He’ll need a few guys around him.

So before the race has even reached the mountains many of Van den Broeck’s teammates could be on their knees after doing the job early for Gilbert and Greipel. Come crunch time Belgium’s best hope of a podium finish in 30-years will be left to fend for himself.

I understand a risk averse two-pronged approach. And as Gilbert has been the rider of the season, so far, any team would put plenty of energy into his Tour aspirations.

Admittedly it’s hard to criticise a team that has had so much success this season but after finishing fifth a year ago Van den Broeck deserves a little more support. There is not one other noted climber on the team.

The lack of support for van den Broeck shows that the decisions made in Cadel’s time at the team had nothing to do with nationality. The general classification at the Tour de France simply isn’t the burning priority for Omega-Pharma Lotto.

Best of luck Jurgen.

Share article: 
top

Comments (6)

04 Jul 2011 14:53 AEST

Colin

From: Cairns

How come Adam Hansen is not on the team? I thought the main reason they acquired Adam is he is one of the best lead-out riders in the world and also an excellent time trialist.

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

03 Jul 2011 23:33 AEST

anon

From: puville

@Blair, the Frank - Andy attacking duo has been proven time and time again to be about as potent as a 70 year old on viagra. If you'd like an example, look no further than this year's Liege Bastogne Liege: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BizjxLt0Q2c

Agree (4 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

03 Jul 2011 21:35 AEST

BMan

From: Melbourne

Lotto's decision to pass on retaining Horner was a disaster for Evans, and probably cost him the win a few yaers ago.

Agree (3 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

02 Jul 2011 19:12 AEST

Sarah

From: Ivahoe

Just goes to prove that all the negative talk about Cadel not taking enough 'risk' back in 2006 was not his own doing but that of the team. It must have been killing him inside not getting the full support to go for it.

Agree (11 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

01 Jul 2011 15:14 AEST

Blair

From: Melbourne

Robbie had good support early (think Steegmans, Freddy Rodrigez, , but that was reduced than taken away once Cadel came on as a genuine contender... the problem was (excepting Horner) the other guys were second teir climbers not suitable for the high mountains. Guys like Mario Aerts are good team mates, but they are not going to deliver you to 2km to go on the Tourmalet ...like Frank will do for Andy

Agree (21 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

01 Jul 2011 13:27 AEST

Holdermort

From: Melbourne

From my knowledge, neither Cadel nor Robbie got much support for their specific aspirations. At least Omega Pharma are supporting potential stage winners this time. Where did Omega Pharma use their helpers back then?

Agree (7 people agree)    Disagree (1 people disagree) Report this
 

Join the discussion

You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.