Fair Play

10 January 2012 | 0:00 - By Anthony Tan

If we are to embrace the true spirit of sport, the national road titles should not have their place cast in stone, argues an obstreperous Anthony Tan.

blog_545086132

Mathew Hayman leads the peloton at the Mars Cycling Australia Road National Championships (Mark Gunter)

Over time, the jersey will lose some of its lustre because Buninyong rewards only a certain type of rider. I respectfully disagree with latest blog to emerge from chez Mike Tomalaris, ‘Don’t bounce Buninyong’. (I warned him about skolling copious amounts of Kool-Aid from the Ballarat corner store.)

It was a great elite men’s race, one of the best in years, as many of you have already said – that much I agree. However, that doesn’t mean as long as the national road title is held on the Buninyong circuit, it will always be great race.

If you want to use your argument, Tomo, then we might as well run the Tour de France route over the same parcours as last year for the next 20 years, because that was a great race and had massive crowds, too!

For the overwhelming majority of other countries, the national road championship is held on a different parcours each year.

Doing so encourages, not detracts, interest (each year, how much is the Tour course analysed, dissected and debated before a pedal is turned?); it also produces different types of winners; and it does not favour those whose have ridden more than a few national titles on the same circuit.

I’m all for rewarding experience, but race experience – not experience in terms of familiarity with the course itself. The latter should only be reserved for the Monuments of the sport – San Remo, Flanders, Roubaix, Liège and Lombardy – and even those intransigent elderly beings have their route modified from time to time.

                                                       * * *

Let’s face it: as exciting as Sunday’s race was, “it was always going to come down to three or four”, as Matt Lloyd, eventual second on the day, said, both before and afterwards.

Why should the likes of Mark Renshaw, Mat Hayman, Michael Matthews, Chris Sutton, Bernard Sulzberger et al – all worthy champions, I think you’d agree – keep showing up, when, even in top nick, they stand little-to-no-chance of claiming the coveted green and gold jersey?

Yes, Robbie McEwen won the title in Buninyong in 2002 but that was then; comparatively, a much weaker field. Much has changed in 10 years, not least the depth of riders Australia now boasts – hence the split in the men’s elite and under-23 fields (from 2007 onwards), and, for the first time this year, restriction to those holding anything other than an Australian racing licence.

Isn’t the essence of sport about giving all competitors a fair go? Over time, I imagine, the jersey will lose some of its lustre because Buninyong rewards only a certain type of rider.

If other States, such as New South Wales, Western Australia and the Northern Territory, are not as strong in terms of their cycling fraternities, then one way of attracting those into the sport and building less established communities would be to stage a marquee event like the national road titles, no?

And for those States that are well established – Tasmania and Queensland come to mind – then let’s see what they have to offer and discover why they’ve become hotbeds of cycling talent.

While we’re at it, why not alternate with one year in regional/country area, one year in a capital city? Do we have to be so steadfast or defeatist and say it’s too hard, too expensive, too highbrow, too whatever?

                                                       * * *

Since I’m high on my soapbox, can people stop calling it an individual race? (Those who continue to spruik so must think we’re thick as Chris Hoy’s legs.) The GreenEDGE guys may have paid for their own entry fees but that’s about the extent of their individual commitments, getting themselves to Ballarat aside.

Let me demonstrate by way of some quotes from our worthy winner Simon Gerrans, from the official press release: “I just capped off some great teamwork from GreenEDGE today, I am so proud of all of the guys”; “with a couple of laps to go, Cameron Meyer ran out of gas and it became an even playing field as we had the same amount of guys at the front as a lot of other teams, so it was pretty much every team for itself and we lost our advantage”; “we just really tried to dominate the race with numbers at GreenEDGE”.

To quote a famous Tweet from Lance Armstrong, after he and Alberto Contador butted heads at the 2009 Tour de France: There is no ‘I’ in team.

So good was Gerro Sunday, he may well have won the race on his own. Nonetheless, after Cam Meyer blew like a trumpet player in the West Australian Symphony Orchestra, his GreenEDGE team-mates placed him the best position possible, which, quite naturally, he took full advantage of.

I also think in the spirit of fair play, teams should be restricted to seven riders. To have the next largest ProTeam representation (that being Team Sky, who fielded four men) just a quarter the size of Le Groupe GreenEDGE makes for a lopsided race.

Again, should this become enforced, regularly changing the course would ensure most, if not all, Australian GreenEDGE riders would get a run.

A credit to all involved, Buninyong/Ballarat has been and is the bellwether for future national championships – but that does not mean they should stay there. If, by next year, it’s too hard to change the location, then please, Mister Craven and Cycling Australia, at least change the course.

Twitter: @anthony_tan

Share article: 
top

Comments (30)

Display: 20 | 40 | All comments per page
Previous 10 | Page 1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10

16 Jan 2012 15:39 AEST

steve

From: adelaide

Totally different context, so rack off. It's ours. btw: they actually *change* the course from year to year.

Agree (3 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

13 Jan 2012 10:31 AEST

Paul

From: Mentone

To open another can of worms the same could be said of the TDU, should it move to other states as well?

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (2 people disagree) Report this
 

13 Jan 2012 6:44 AEST

Stephn

From: Brisbane Qld

It is still technically an individual event is correct obviously its raced as a team event. I agree best practice would be change the course every so often. This years was a fantastic event and those that enjoy the style of racing such as Tomo we saw on Sunday would want this course again, others not. If it were a flat sprinters course with a team train for a sprinter I would think the arguement then would be that course needs to change. No course is going to make everyone 100% happy.

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Jan 2012 12:35 AEST

Murray

From: Melbourne

The World Championship RR was a sprint finish, yet it was anything but boring

Agree (1 people agree)    Disagree (3 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Jan 2012 11:42 AEST

Chris

From:

Cynical I know but did anyone else ponder the pro and con opinions coming a day apart to get the debate flowing? It may be contrived but it is a very good discussion with both sides having merit. At the end of the day the ultimate decision will not be cycling based but will depend on a willing host city, sponsors and the corporate bang for buck. Ballarat had a crack and won the rights because it ticked all of the boxes listed above.

Agree (3 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Jan 2012 10:28 AEST

LMH5

From:

Ummm, Frank? You're making it sound like they only do the climb once.

Agree (3 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

12 Jan 2012 0:13 AEST

Scott

From: Melbourne

A Nats road race with a high liklyhood of a bunch sprint finish is just a very long means to an end, does not reward individual effort like the current course & is mostly boring viewing. What are the Crit nationals if not a forum for a sprinter to display his sprinting ability? Still green and gold up for grabs. I would prefer that our champion is a rider willing to pull himself inside out to win rather than a rider who keeps out of the wind for 99% of the race & then pops out for the win.

Agree (7 people agree)    Disagree (1 people disagree) Report this
 

11 Jan 2012 21:44 AEST

Peter Walsh

From: Casino

Must agree with the Tan man, we could become very boring!

Agree (2 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

11 Jan 2012 15:54 AEST

Malcolm

From: Robe

Matthew Lloyd-No Team

Agree (5 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

10 Jan 2012 22:02 AEST

Mike Rann

From: SA

Grand Tours and National titles internationally do change their venues and routes, but only after towns and cities make it known they want the event, and compete for the right to host. So, if not Buningyong, where? Who else exactly is making it known they definitely want to host the Australian National Championships?

Agree (8 people agree)    Disagree (3 people disagree) Report this
 
Display: 20 | 40 | All comments per page
Previous 10 | Page 1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10

Join the discussion

You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.