Never-ending stories

15 May 2012 | 11:00 - By Philip Gomes

If you've been around the traps for a while observing the to-ing and fro-ing of cycling discourse you'll find two kinds of stories that never seem to die.

shadows_640_getty_1569192427

Cyclists shadowed (Getty Images)

One is the hard to take seriously big media blowhard banging on about Lycra louts on either the AM airwaves or in the pages of one of the big city tabloids.

Stepping into the breach yesterday for one of those yarns was failed shock jock Steve Price, who threw the entire bag of hammers in his head at, wait for it, “Cycle Nazis”.

Now Internet lore has it that "given enough time, in any online discussion, regardless of topic or scope, someone inevitably criticises some point made in the discussion by comparing it to beliefs held by Hitler and the Nazis”.

But usually you have to wait until the 20th comment or so below any article before someone decides to compare some perceived outrage or other to Adolf and his jackbooted acolytes, or mention Nazis.

Unfortunately for Price he Godwinned himself before the caterpillar tracks of his brain gained any traction, but that didn't stop our failed megaphone megalomaniac from dropping all sorts of newly (to him) imagined bon mots.

"Melbourne isn't Amsterdam and doesn't want to be," he thundered. "They (cyclists) don't pay registration fees, are probably not city ratepayers, and add nothing to the local city economy aside from buying coffee and those ludicrous Lycra shorts," he asserted without proof.

The much-maligned Middle Aged Men in Lycra (MAMiL's) also copped a spray of Price's brainless buckshot. "Bike riding might be the new jogging and it has become trendy as a way of exercise, especially for older, overweight men who can't run and love Cadel Evans."

As if a desire to be a healthy middle aged man who admires a truly gifted athlete and all round nice guy, is a bad thing. This from a man who spends his weekends singing the praises of those sporting role models plying their trade on the fields of the National Rugby League (NRL).

Price closed his thankfully paywalled diatribe, designed to stir the masses (white van men and the over 60 crowd who listen to right-wing talkback) into open revolt over the horrible fate that awaits Melbourne, with the only true thing in his piece.

"It (cycling) will never be a mass transport solution for Melbourne and should be funded accordingly." Which of course it isn't, because it isn’t.

The second never-ending story is really more of a distraction to the main game of making cycling safe and plentiful in Australia than it is a Pricean sledge at Melbourne's cycling hordes.

Usually dissent on the issue of helmet legislation comes from libertarian types and some cycling activists, probably more disturbed by the sight of helmet head than reality, but this time the source is a bit different, the Mayor of Fremantle Brad Pettitt and Independent Fremantle MP Adele Carles.

The good mayor and his sidekick want to give a two-year no-helmet trial in the West Australian city a run in an attempt to boost cycling numbers. The proposal will make helmets optional for adults riding on separated cycleways, dual-use paths and roads with a speed limit of 50km/h or less.

This idea I like because it should clarify thinking about a wrongly perceived objection to riding a bicycle.

"I think a trial is a very good idea and anything that collects data on cycling is good for future policies but the alliance will not be formally campaigning to have the law lifted," said the somewhat ironically named Bicycle Transport Alliance spokesperson Heinrich Benz.

"Removing helmet legislation may lead to increased cycle numbers but it is not something we will be pushing. There are more important things we are worried about. This topic is a bit of a red herring, it is a distraction from the lack of spending on cycling infrastructure that Perth cyclists desperately want and need."

A "red herring" it is because bicycle sales in Australia remain strong at more than one million sold each year, almost all of them with helmets. The buying public now know a 'skid lid' is part and parcel of riding a bike and are voting with their wallets in vast numbers.

The real issue here is not fashion but infrastructure, as Benz noted, "We need to invest money and time into making roads safer for cyclists and look into things like more cycle paths, safe passing distances and lower speed limits, above things like helmet laws."

All things that ought to make Steve Price's head really explode.


Share article: 
top

Comments (15)

Display: 20 | 40 | All comments per page
Previous 10 | Page 1 | 2 | Next 10

03 Jul 2012 23:24 AEST

Matt

From: Brisbane

Are we going to make wearing sunscreen compulsory as well? You're more likely to get skin cancer on a bike than get an injury a helmet would help you with.

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

03 Jul 2012 23:22 AEST

Matthew

From: Brisbane

Phil don't be silly. We're allowed to drink booze, even though it will kill us. We're allowed to smoke, even though it will kill us. We're not allowed to go the wrong way through roundabouts because that kills others. Seatbelts actually save lives, and don't give you heatstroke. unlike helmets which are a minor bandaid on the real problem (cars hitting people on bikes) A failed comparison.

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

23 May 2012 21:17 AEST

Dave Bugden

From: Seddon

The true beauty of paywalls is that it keeps preaching jocks close to their rusted on admirers and away from the rest of us. Phil, great work on the article. Sheer numbers of riders will eventually render these anti-cycling rants to the fringes. In the meantime, we just have to keep riding.

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

18 May 2012 13:55 AEST

njptower

From: melbourne

He is not the worst, alan jones should be considered

Agree (2 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

18 May 2012 13:10 AEST

njptower

From: Melbourne

Paywalls are beautiful things if it keeps steve price's rantings out of my reach. Great article Philip. Helmets - I wear one because it protects and has protected my head. Seatbelts - I wear them because they provide a secure driving position (and might provide protection in a crash) Bicycles take up far less space per user than motor vehicles - to reduce road congestion we should get people out of cars and onto bikes or in to public transport.

Agree (1 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

17 May 2012 11:48 AEST

Chris

From: Victoria

Nice response Phil. Never ceases to amaze me how clowns like Price get the opportunity to air their moronic opinion on any given topic. An expert on nothing but with a view on everything. More than ironic that convicted drnk driver Price ventures into matters of road safety. As the old adage says "opinions are like a*&^%holes; everyones got one"

Agree (2 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

16 May 2012 10:23 AEST

Peter

From: Shepparton

I cant help but notice the size of Steve Price's "Sump" when he is on the 7pm project on Channel 10. Me thinks he should go a bit easier on cyclists and perhaps even join the lycra circus. That way he won't be as likely to be taking a shortcut to the morgue on a trolley like he seems to be destined for at the moment.

Agree (1 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

16 May 2012 7:15 AEST

Phil (Ed)

From: Sydney

Randolph, there are many things we're "compelled" to do and are not a choice, by law. Seat belts, roundabouts, traffic lights and other road rules you have to follow are also a compulsion by the state for safety, and they don't stop people buying cars. Are you arguing for freedom of choice from those and others like it, as well? Where do you start and stop?

Agree (13 people agree)    Disagree (2 people disagree) Report this
 

16 May 2012 1:07 AEST

Randolph

From: Cairns

buying a helmet is not a choice, it's a compulsion.Restore our democratic "freedom of choice" and then you can say that people are "voting with their wallets".

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (4 people disagree) Report this
 

15 May 2012 19:21 AEST

Claire

From: Toowoomba

It's about time there was a discussion about these stupid helmet laws.The boffins who drew up these laws have never riden a bike during a Queensland summer.Better to have deaths from skin cancer as those satistics are another departments problem.

Agree (2 people agree)    Disagree (4 people disagree) Report this
 
Display: 20 | 40 | All comments per page
Previous 10 | Page 1 | 2 | Next 10

Join the discussion

You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.