Winning formula

03 July 2012 | 13:00 - By Al Hinds

Between 2009 and 2011, Highroad forever altered a well-established sprinting culture, and created a new formula for success - but such success devalued both the effort of the team and its lead sprinter Mark Cavendish, writes Al Hinds.

cavendish_640_blog_1363960840

Mark Cavendish (Getty Images)

The haphazard organisations of trains under Mario Cipollini in the Saeco days, and Alessandro Petacchi in the Fasso Bortolo and Milram era, was taken to a whole new level under Bob Stapelton at Highroad.

Its ability to perfectly time its efforts was akin to the Tokyo Metro system. Well-oiled, effective and something that could always be relied upon.

With Tony Martin, Bernard Eisel, Mark Renshaw, Matt Goss and of course Mark Cavendish, it's fair to say that the team was also not lacking firepower.

But to put the success of Highroad down only to the composition of the train would be an injustice.

It's a mistruth that devalued the efforts of Cavendish. Cav was always quick to praise his team in the post-stage interviews of yesteryear, but it would be a mistake to say the Manx Missile was gifted wins, or that Highroad wasn't doing something special.

It's a mistruth that has been perpetuated all year, that Cavendish would require more than half of Sky to be competitive at the Tour de France, that Andre Greipel and Matt Goss's trains at Lotto-Belisol and Orica-GreenEDGE respectively would trump the world champion's solo efforts.

What was revealed in Tournai at the close of Stage 2 was a two-fold message.

Putting together a sprint train is a clinical process that is more complex than Highroad was ever given proper credit for honing. Lotto-Belisol, with all its sprint riches (Juergen Roelandts, Marcel Sieberg, Greg Henderson and Greipel) were left at the front slightly too early and it cost them.

Mistakes were also present in Orica-GreenEDGE. Boxed in and unable to give Goss clear air, the Australian had to be happy with third past the finish line.

Pulling off a train is not quite so simple as perhaps the past few years would have you believe.

Cavendish, meanwhile, went about his craft and as any master artisan does, producing a consistent result from a well-practiced effort. Winning is synonymous with the Mark Cavendish name.

Winning alone less so, but that Cavendish had a train at Highroad was more happenstance than prerequisite for him winning. He did it alone in Copenhagen, at San Remo, and on countless occasions before.

Of the top 20 riders over the line in Stage 2, not one is an unrecognised name in the world of sprinting.

This was no mean feat. For all the posturing that went on before the stage, before the Tour, Cavendish simply allowed his pedigree to shine through, and was a deserved, if slightly self-doubting winner.

With Peter Sagan of Liquigas-Cannondale in such good touch, Cavendish firing, and Greipel an angry man after the finish of Stage 2, this year's sprints, and the battle for the maillot vert, are going to be a treat.

Share article: 
top

Comments (5)

07 Jul 2012 19:34 AEST

Peter Walsh

From: Casino NSW

television coverage

It is 2012 why do we not get the full coverage. This is the biggest race of the year yet we get the abridged version, admittedly not by much but why bother when we have to sit up halfthe night to watch it anyway. I have complained before, just imagine the whinge if we only saw an abridged version of the football World Cup or highlight of the Ashes. Isn't time the coverage was the full coverage. What I do see I love and so do the people I speak to, I think we are just being sold short.

Agree (2 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

07 Jul 2012 11:30 AEST

JohnT

From: Sydney

SBS TdF coverage is so spectacularly good that my grizzles will seem small. But they affect me like fingernails on a blackboard. It's only one commentator; I never catch his name. First problem: he calls the Climber's Jersey "poker dot". SBS: red-spots-on-white is "POL-ka dot", like the folk(!) dance. His other problem: delivery. Multiple short phrases, every one beginning around top-C and ending in B-flat. So monotonous, so boring, oh where's my Mute?

Agree (1 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

05 Jul 2012 18:40 AEST

Ross Turner

From: Narrabeen

I would ask Mike Tomalaris when giving t he highlights that he include SOME information on Cadel's results, since he IS an ozzie, and Aussie's watching would surprisingly like to know Cadel's outcome on the completion of the stage.....unlike tonight's update by mike giving NO info on Cadel!!!

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

05 Jul 2012 16:14 AEST

Adam

From:

It's good to see an article that gives Cav credit. It's about a lot more than just stomping on the peddles really fast. While there's no doubting Renshaw's skill as a lead-out man, Cav wasn't the lucky benefactor of Renshaw's draft - he can read a race in his own right as evidenced in Stage 2. The interview with him afterwards shows that he knows who's who in the zoo and which wheel to follow when, how to get himself to the front and, most importantly, when to pounce for a given finish.

Agree (1 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

03 Jul 2012 22:38 AEST

Jeff Carmichael

From: Grimsby Town

It was funny to see three former Highroad riders in the top 3. Also funny to note that Lotto-Belisol other than Roelandts is all former Highroad riders.

Agree (1 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

Join the discussion

You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.