A green light for Cav?

24 July 2012 | 0:00 - By Philip Gomes

A day ago there was an unusual statement  attributed to Team Sky principal David Brailsford in the wake of Bradley Wiggins's historic Tour de France victory.

cavendish_640_aap_548575540

Mark Cavendish does domestique duties for Team Sky at the 2012 Tour de France (AAP Images)

Brailsford was apparently responding to questions surrounding the future of sprinter Mark Cavendish at Sky after a Tour in which the world champion was effectively left to his own devices, fetching water and catching wind for the general classification riders, while Andre Greipel (Lotto-Belisol), Peter Sagan (Liquigas-Cannondale) and to a lesser extent Matt Goss (Orica GreenEDGE) were given free rein on the flat stages.

In the end Cavendish saved his Tour with stunning performances on stage 18 and on the Champs-Elysees. But that may not have been enough when it comes to his relationship with Sky.

“If he (Cavendish) felt, or if it was felt, that he would like a dedicated team around him, then he is quite within his rights to want to do that,” Brailsford was quoted as saying in the BBC article.

Now that is a statement guaranteed to get the phones running hot in professional cycling. Brailsford has effectively given Cavendish the green light to look elsewhere after only a year in Sky colours. He has a three year contract with the British outfit.

“This team will keep its GC [general classification] ambitions and I am sure that we will sit down and discuss that with Mark and see how he feels about that,” Brailsford continued. “He is a prolific British winner and on the one hand we would love to have a prolific British winner on the team.

“We wouldn't fall out about it, there wouldn't be an issue about it, but we are very proud to have him on Team Sky, he is a fantastic champion and long may that continue. I can't see an issue at all, there's no problem and we will take the common-sense approach and sort it out like that.

Brailsford then laid out the inescapable logic in his thinking with this last statement.

“If you're going to become the best cycling team the world's ever seen, you've got to win the biggest race in the world [the Tour de France] time and time again. I am quite driven by that: to see what it takes to be the best professional team this sport has ever seen. The components of that would be success over time.”

It’s unsurprising there would be tensions between competing disciplines within Team Sky, and given Brailsford's explicit statement that winning the Tour de France will be an ongoing priority for Sky you can see that Cavendish will continue to be the odd man out despite his successes.

There is tension between the GC talent as well but that is likely to resolve itself given the relative ages of Wiggins and Tour runner-up, Chris Froome. Wiggins is 32 and Froome just 27. Despite rumours of Froome flying the Sky coop, they have a British successor in place and the Kenyan born rider is that man. Wiggins is past the average age of Tour winners (29) while Froome has yet to hit his real peak.

Cavendish is also in his prime at 27 and has shown no sign of slowing down, in fact the opposite, he seems to be getting faster, and smarter. So a team dedicated to the goal of winning five Tour stages each year and the green jersey for Cavendish makes sense. That was the winning formula at his now disbanded HTC-Highroad team.

When Cavendish signed on with Sky one of the first questions put to the team was about their management of two agendas, a tilt at both the yellow jersey (GC) and green jersey (points) in the 2012 Tour.

The team stated they thought it was doable while Tour history said it was not, yet they persisted. But now that the Tour is over we know that isn't possible. The naysayers were right.

Modern professional cycling demands a sophisticated specificity from both riders and teams. True GC riders target a Grand Tour victory and sprinters tour stages, classics and world road championships, teams are also built around those goals.

For Cavendish to reclaim the green jersey he lost to Peter Sagan and continue with his prolific winning ways at the Tour de France, he must change teams.

It appears Brailsford has given him a green light to pursue his ambitions.

The October transfer season will be an interesting one to watch.
 


Share article: 
top

Comments (15)

Display: 20 | 40 | All comments per page
Previous 10 | Page 1 | 2 | Next 10

25 Jul 2012 23:26 AEST

Mike (Brighton)

From:

Agree...he won't go to Rabo..they have Bos, Renshaw & Matthews. OGE are totally committed to Goss. If Sagan & Greipel continue to be strong and Renshaw & Rabo and OGE & Goss sharpen leadout train then Cav probably knows its better to stay at Sky were he has a strong team, a huge budget and more chances to deliver wins.

Agree (3 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

25 Jul 2012 23:19 AEST

Mike (Brighton)

From:

And what's this got to do with this article about CAV?

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (1 people disagree) Report this
 

25 Jul 2012 17:45 AEST

Daniel

From: Leeds

This could always be another classic Brailsford 'cat amongst the pigeons' comment... What's to say that Cavendish has any intention of leaving and Brailsford isn't just hoping that ahead of the Olympics, and while most teams are looking to finalise rosters for next year, he can cause some confusion and have his opposition scrambling to try and sign Cav who's actually going nowhere?

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (3 people disagree) Report this
 

25 Jul 2012 6:52 AEST

Cycling Mumma

From: Victoria

I don't think it is possibly for Sky (and probably any other team) to aim for yellow and green jersey honors. The race (TDF) is too tough for that, especially if they are still concentrating on Wiggins as their main man, they need all the climbers they can which leaves Cav out in the cold again. Will be interesting to see what comes to head over the next few months.

Agree (13 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

24 Jul 2012 22:55 AEST

Bonecrasher

From: London

Why people are speculating over Cav's future is beyond me. He is not overly worried about Green. What he wants is stage wins and he won three of those this year. He also had 2 more chances to add to that but in one he was beaten by Greipel and in the other he crushed. If those had come off he would have had 5 stage wins, so as long as he keeps getting chances like that at SKY he will not be going anywhere. Besides he has got a fat contract there!

Agree (4 people agree)    Disagree (6 people disagree) Report this
 

24 Jul 2012 18:45 AEST

Sam

From: Melbourne

Cav moving being the reason HTC pulled out is often-touted - the fact is that HTC pulled out of cycling to sponsor basketball instead - nothing to do with Cav

Agree (4 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

24 Jul 2012 18:43 AEST

Sam

From: Melbourne

I'm unconvinced Cav's wont stay for at least another year. I dont think Green's a deal-breaker for him - he wants the stages but he's smart enough to know that if Sagan returns in similar mode, he'll be there at the end of really lumpy stages. IF he moves, it would only be to OPQS, I'm certain.Forget Rabobank - dont forget they have GC goals as well with Gsink plus except for LL Sanchez they're not exactly over-whelmingly successful or well-run. Cant see him at OGE at all.

Agree (1 people agree)    Disagree (4 people disagree) Report this
 

24 Jul 2012 18:04 AEST

Marty

From: Brunswick

Nibali and Sagan worked fine in the same team. SKY have the talent and I'd the want to be the best ever then I see no reason why they couldn't do the double. Cav showed this year he doesn't need a HTC style lead out to win just a bit more sheltering when needed.

Agree (11 people agree)    Disagree (3 people disagree) Report this
 

24 Jul 2012 17:57 AEST

Dylan

From: Boambee East

I was utterly surprised not by Sky but by the riders selected by BMC to defend Cadels title. I mean seriously Phillipe Gilbert, completely out of form all year but still selected. Van Garderen fair enough but the rest of the team was totally mismatched especially to ride at the front through the mountains a la Porte, Rogers, Froome, boasson haagen the climber, even Eisel and sistsou who abandoned!. Burghardt was the pick of the bunch for BMC. BMC's Tour of Austria team was far stronger.

Agree (12 people agree)    Disagree (6 people disagree) Report this
 

24 Jul 2012 14:21 AEST

Liz

From: Queensland

HHHMMM I would wait till next year as Cav made it clear that being an Olympic year he was not interested in chasing the Green Jersey. I feel that will change next year. I for one am excited to see how Sagan and Cav stack up against one another. Sagan has proved he can get over the mountains while Cav struggles, but Cav is definitely faster on the flat finishes.

Agree (20 people agree)    Disagree (1 people disagree) Report this
 
Display: 20 | 40 | All comments per page
Previous 10 | Page 1 | 2 | Next 10

Join the discussion

You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.