Festina, Mulan and why Lance is not enough

31 August 2012 | 13:00 - By The Broom Wagon

Highlights of 1998: Bear Grylls climbs Mt Everest, France wins its first World Cup, Chumbawamba release this:

Livestrong_640_AAP_1916131907




Lowlights: the realisation that it would take the next 10 years to get Tubthumping out of your head (you're welcome!), and the Festina affair. (Also: Mulan).

Festina and the Lance Armstrong revelations have been our sport's two most damaging scandals of the past 14 years. And as with Mulan II (2005, direct to video) the second can be traced back to the first.

A quick recap of l'affaire Festina: Willy Voet, a soigneur for the French team, was stopped on the Belgian border on his way to the Tour de France. Customs officials searching his Fiat Marea found a bootload of doping products. A police investigation followed. The team was kicked out of the Tour de France.

In the whole sordid schemozzle, the extraordinary figure was Christophe Bassons.

A Frenchman whose name is not known widely enough, Bassons rode for Festina from 1996 to 1998. When the team was busted, most riders admitted to having been doping. Even star rider Richard Virenque finally confessed when on trial, two years after tearfully protesting his innocence on French TV. The only rider on Festina who was not implicated was Bassons. To a man, his teammates told investigators that he had been clean.

The 1999 Tour, coming year one after Festina, was supposed to be the beginning of a new era. Riders were spooked by the previous year's uproar. Sponsors were twitchy. Insiders that year said the peloton was the cleanest it had been for years.

Bassons was by then riding in new colours, for Française des Jeux. During the race he wrote a column for a French newspaper, Le Parisien. Most of his columns were innocuous. But on stage nine, Armstrong, the new wearer of the yellow jersey after the previous stage's time trial, smoked the field on the climb to Sestriere. Bassons had previously spoken of the two-speed peloton. One speed for dopers, another for clean riders like him. After the Sestriere stage he wrote in Le Parisien that riders were shocked by Armstrong's speed.



For Armstrong, Sestriere was the beginning of his seven-year reign at the Tour. But for Bassons the episode was the beginning of the end. Armstrong, who kept the yellow jersey from Sestriere to Paris, admitted to confronting Bassons after reading his column. He told him to either keep quiet or leave the sport. "His accusations aren't good for cycling, for his team, for me, for anybody," Armstrong said on French TV. "If he thinks cycling works like that, he's wrong and he would be better off going home."

Pressured by Armstrong and other riders, Bassons quit the 1999 Tour. The long list of positives and admissions in the years to follow suggests the peloton got the message. Here was the new era, same as the old era. Armstrong won that year's Tour, his first, by over seven minutes to Alex Zulle. Bassons retired in 2001, aged 27, unable to find a team or get a race.

While Armstrong is now engaged in defiantly protecting his legacy, Bassons works for the French ministry of sport and youth, where he has responsibility for drug testing.

He spoke to Le Monde this week in the wake of Armstrong's lifetime ban. "If you break the law of silence," he said, "you can assume that you will never win a race again."

Last Friday the New York Times published this graphic. While not news, it's startling to see the mess of the last 14 years laid out. Since Festina, only three Tour de France winners remain untainted by doping (they are Carlos Sastre, Cadel Evans and Bradley Wiggins). The only untainted podium was this year's.

In the context of the Armstrong case, there are at least two things we can usefully learn from Festina and Bassons.

Firstly, such things rarely happen in isolation. Pursuing Festina in 1998 was not enough. The problem went beyond the team. The sport needed top-down reform, but in 1999 administrators were unable or unwilling to enforce meaningful change.

Secondly, things tend not to end well if we ignore people who are brave enough to talk about the problems. Ignore Bassons and Emma O'Reilly and David Walsh, and you get Dr Michele Ferrari and Armstrong and Dr Luis Garcia del Moral. And of course the peril of ignoring whistleblowers, as any good student of 1998 will know, is not only found in the stories of Bassons and Festina. It's also in Mulan.

The week in …

… panache


You'll never guess which retired Italian sprinter stars in this video, in which he jumps out of a helicopter, is chased by baddies on motorcycles and hangs out with beautiful models. Clue: it is not Guido Bontempi.




… positives

When a member of a country's own cycling union is busted for doping, you know something is rotten in the state of Denmark (pun shamelessly nicked from Twitter's @cycletard).

… dreams

"I'd love to have a professional women's racing team," Bradley Wiggins tells ITV.



Dispatches from the Twitterverse




Classic YouTube

Mountain biking in Nepal is, it will come as no surprise, stunningly beautiful.

Share article: 
top

Comments (9)

05 Sep 2012 11:24 AEST

MikeB

From: Sydney

Another conspiracy front has opened on Riis - http://tinyurl.com/bpyckd7 We need Vaughters and Bruyneel and dodgy team management under the spotlight. The Managers and DS's are more important target for USADA than the riders to me as they set the tone and values for the teams. I can't for the life of me understand why brands like NikeSaxo would want to associate themselves with doping and cheating. The Onion has it sussed though ha ha http://store.theonion.com/

Agree (2 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

04 Sep 2012 0:30 AEST

Mike (Brighton)

From:

Thanks Dean. But Damo probably chose to ignore it. Lance got lifetime ban because he not only cheated but he trafficked. I wasn't aware that Cadel got training plans from Dr Ferrari but rather the he tested Cadel's capacity to move from mountain bike to road cycling. Have a read of an article by Dr Ferrari http://www.53x12.com/do/show?page=indepth.view&id=123

Agree (1 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

03 Sep 2012 14:06 AEST

Dean

From:

damo, read the charge sheet from USADA. Charge 1 - using a prohibited substance - carries a sanction of 2 years Charges 2-5 - aiding others to use prohibited substances, trafficking of prohibited substances, conspiracy to cover up doping activity - this is what carries the lifetime ban. I really hope your assertion that Cadel is untainted holds true - he did receive "training plans" from Dr Ferrari in the past.

Agree (3 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

02 Sep 2012 18:29 AEST

damo

From: t'ville

Mike (Brighton) - yeah I'm sure my little opinion is fueling the fire, did I put a time frame on the exposure of evidence ? No, has the USADA acted already to ban Armstrong ? Yes, so they obviously feel the job is done, so let's see what they have & be done with it. Get stuck in mate, but until the USADA shows incontrevertible proof the fire will burn of it's own accord with no help from me. Armstrong -life ban, all other dopers, 2 years ? ask yourself why ?

Agree (0 people agree)    Disagree (5 people disagree) Report this
 

01 Sep 2012 16:55 AEST

Mike (Brighton)

From:

damo...there are still cases before the authorities so even if USADA wanted to release the evidence they can't. So read all the facts before you make ill informed comments because comments like yours just fuel the fire and feed into the negative comments about authorities who do give a damn and have the interests of cycling foremost in their pursuit of the truth and cleaning out all levels of cheating which includes, cyclists, doctors and team directors.

Agree (7 people agree)    Disagree (2 people disagree) Report this
 

01 Sep 2012 0:09 AEST

James

From: Sydney

these first 2 comments this week must be the 2 most serious comments ever left in response to a Broom Wagon article. That is however justified. No where near as funny an article as usual BUT it certainly proves that there is immense journalistic skill behind these articles each week... well written Broom Wagon!

Agree (13 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

31 Aug 2012 23:56 AEST

damo

From: t'ville

I think they'll only have really showed anything is when they show everything they have against Armstrong. Let the world see the indisputable evidence & let us all move forward. Or else keep it a secret & continue in the same vein as the dopers they seek to unveil, show us the money USADA & help us heal our sport, or shut-up & get out of the way of people who do really love cycling, because if you can't show us the evidence then you are no better than those who deny it's existence.

Agree (6 people agree)    Disagree (5 people disagree) Report this
 

31 Aug 2012 21:38 AEST

Matt

From: Sydney

Finally - someone showing leadership, independence and governance for clean cycling - USADA - go hard !

Agree (14 people agree)    Disagree (1 people disagree) Report this
 

31 Aug 2012 19:40 AEST

damo

From: t'ville

I think this is why it is so important the USADA publicly shows it's evidence against Armstrong- prove it & let the cartharsis begin. Cycling has so much good yet continually lets so much bad over ride it. If one of the biggest heroes of the sport is a cheat then show it & let the future begin afresh, if there really isn't any proof then let's deal with it & find a new way to keep the sport clean. The fact that the 3 winners untainted by doping are recent ones indicates there is hope.

Agree (19 people agree)    Disagree (0 people disagree) Report this
 

Join the discussion

You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

PLEASE NOTE: All submitted comments become the property of SBS. We reserve the right to edit and/or amend submitted comments. HTML tags other than paragraph, line break, bold or italics will be removed from your comment.