Blogs
Wiggins on the money about track
Bradley Wiggins is on the money when he says the International Olympic
Committee is "trying to kill off track endurance events" come the 2012
London Games.
The IOC has pledged to even up the men and women programs which is currently lopsided by 7-3 for the men for the track events.
While
I'm definitely not against allowing women "equal rights", by reducing
the men's programs it'll force male riders to either quit the sport or
turn to the road.
This is important because track endurance
cycling has been the backbone of the sport in Britain and Australia for
more than a century.
Thumb through the history books and
track events have always been a part of the sporting landscape,
particularly in Australia where many cycling champions have been
produced down the years.
From Edgar "Dunc" Gray to Brad
McGee, from Danny Clark to Cameron Meyer Aussies have dominated the
velodromes at Olympic, world championship and Commonwealth Games level.
But I fear times are-a-changing and track cycling may not quite have the appeal to either rider, spectator (and the IOC for that matter), as it once may have.
As
a passionate follower of all forms of cycling, I make my observations
from the quality of male riders from nations currently competing at the
elite level outside either Australia or Great Britain.
At
this year's UCI track cycling World Championships in Poland, 19 gold
medals were decided with Australia, France, Great Britain, Denmark and
Germany collecting a combined total of 13 - that's a ratio of more than
68 percent.
That compares to the self-represented riders from 29 nations who started the 2009 Tour de France from Monaco.
It
tells me only a handful of nations are committed to providing proper
funding for a sport which requires money - and lots of it.
Few nations of the 200-plus affiliated with the IOC can afford to buy a bike let alone provide funding for a track cycling team, riders and a velodrome in which to train.
And
at a time when the professional road scene has so much worldwide appeal
courtesy of the global exposure it receives from the big Grand Tours,
it's the track scene that's being left out in the cold and, sadly,
neglected.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but riders would prefer
to follow the lure of the money that can be made from the pro-scene,
rather than rely on government funding which is the case for track
riders.
Name me a rider who has got rich from a successful
track career, and I'll name you several professional roadies who are
living a life of luxury?
Take Chris Hoy for example who is
perhaps the highest profiled track rider in the world today. While he
may be making a comfortable living, the money he earns pales into
insignificance to the likes of Lance Armstrong, AlbertoContador and Cadel Evans.
It
hurts Wiggins to say that endurance track cycling is on the way out -
after all he's earned his keep as a triple Olympic gold medalist and
six-time world champion.
But with the road scene now the commercial "heartbeat" of world cycling, it seems trackies are starting to see the writing on the wall?
Your Say
Brisbane
If the total number of olympic events is the problem, why don't they get rid of some swimming events - its as boring as batshit; upside down events, back to front events, this distance, that distance, one person, then 4 people, 500 hundred heats, who could care less. And athletics; throwing spears and hammers and skipping into sand pits whats the relevance of all of this rubbish by comparison to a sport that is at least based on a useful means of getting from A to B is for so many of us a party of our daily routine
Parramatta
My understanding is that the IOC can only sanction a limited number of medal events so to increase the women's cycling to seven would defeat the purpose - no?
Melb
If anything this is an insult from the IOC to women's track in that it is so unwilling to give it 7 events that it would rather cut some mens events to even the gender bias.
parramatta
I would say that most of Australia's elite women would welcome the introduction of more medal events at Olympic level - even Kate Bates. More medals means more profile - wouldn't it?
Gold Coast
I have to agree that this is the 'thin end of the wedge' that will ultimately force track events out of the Olympics. Sacrificing some disciplines of one gender for the benefit of another gender will not improve the position of the sport. We have already seen some track disciplines be sacrificed for BMX, more will follow. Track cycling simply doesn't attract the sponsorship dollars that road cycling does and will, unfortunately, die a slow commercial death.
Sydney
I don't think Katie Bates (World Points Race Champion 07) would agree that scraping events will help any women. If you look at the Women at the AIS (Tomic, Dunn, Ankudinoff, Gilmore, Georgouras, Bates and Kitchen to name a few), this proposal will be scraping their specific events. I don't see how that can be supporting women.
Perth
I think you missed the point Jeanette - we should be debating why can't the uci increase the number of women's track events to equal the men's. It's not like other sports will be wanting to use the velodrome so why not maximize it's use?
Adelaide
I'm sorry Jeanette but increasing women events is how you achieve gender equality not sacrifising important aspects of the sport. The bottom line is a reduction in cycling events will make cycling suffer which can't be considered good news fo men or women.
Canberra
Actually I see this a a big loss for both men's and women's track cycling. We have already seen the number track cycling event being downgraded due to the inclusion of BMX, now we are seeing some of the best parts of the sport being removed just so that we can achieve some PC agenda. What would have been better would have been to increase the number of women's events to the same level as the men's. This would have been a postive. Instead we will have to sit through 800 different way to swim a 50m pool just to get a glimpse of something worth watching.
Melbourne
Yes, Wiggo was either careless or completely off-beam in his comments about female cyclists. Equal representation is very much the way to go. But killing off endurance events to get such representation is not good. Personally, I think the pursuit, points race and madison events are the most exciting track cycling events, and it hardly seems worth building a velodrome if all you're going to run in it is a few sprints. If they're concerned about broadening participation, the easiest way to do that would be to ban most of the high-tech equipment from track bikes. Metal bikes with box-section metal are pretty cheap.

Video
Podcasts
Blogs
.jpg)


