She confessed its over

Americans dont have any rights that was confirmed by the way the treat civilans. All civil rights world wide are revoked and have been for sometime. If we ever had any.

There was no mixed blood

There was no mixed blood - this was never claimed by the prosecution. http://www.sciencespheres.com/2010/04/lie-of-month-club.html

Simple mistakes

No Mixed blood ! This is false! Exactly the kind of mistakes made by the press that led readers to believe she was guilty when she is not. Please be responsible and retract this false statement or people will present it as facts.

opportunists NOT journalists

missing is parallel footage, photos of Raffaele & Amanda in a sweltering max security prison, as these parasites slurp their wine on the expense accounts of yellow rags & the prosecution on their summer vacations hover ouija boards communicating w/ the bat **** crazy broad who "inspired" the reopening of the Monster Of Florence case. Frustrated actors, dictators, desperate for their 15 minutes of fame. Sick & tragic, not a shred of conscience, empathy from this opportunistic bunch. FAIL!

"... a man hears what he wants to hear and diregards the rest" The Boxer - Simon and Garfunkel

Under italian law, the defense lawyers are allowed to attend with their own DNA experts the supervision of any DNA testing carried out by the police. NONE, of the 3 accused, K,S,G attended. Why? Because having NOT attended they can whinge and moan that the testing was faulty. No DNA at the crime scene? Just footprints of Knox and Sollecito and 3 blood staine belonging to Knox, despite what susan says. Was Knox even in Parugia that night? No, she's innocent as hell!

Mixed blood evidence completely discredited.

Barbie, I commend you on your fine housekeeping, but I'm glad Susan pointed out the mixed blood issue. According to Fisher - "Injustice.." - page 140, there was no mixed blood detected as such anywhere. Waterbury - "Monster.." - page 64 - speaks of the irrelevancy of mixed samples when several people live in the same apartment, and the prosecution withholding of the TMB tests pg. 87. Savive - "Study Abroad.." - pg. 276 mentions cross contamination in the lab.

Mistake

There is a serious mistake in this documentary. It shows a bloody handprint on the wall and then claims the fingerprints from that handprint was matched to Rudy Guede. This is incorrect. The handprint on the wall was too smeared and so couldn't be matched to any individual. The fingerprints connecting Rudy Guede to the crime scene actually came from a handprint he had left on a pillow. It's also interesting how 95% of the evidence from this case is not even mentioned in this documentary.

Barbie Nadeau has her facts wrong. There was NO 'mixed blood'.

It is amazing that this forensic lie is being repeated by Nadeau again. It was proven that only Amanda's DNA was in the bathroom that she shares, not her blood. Nadeau's adherence to her view of Amanda as somehow guilty borders on attack journalism.