UK told before Iraq invasion that case was 'patchy'

26 Nov 2009, 2:33 pm   -   Source: AAP, SBS staff
0 Comments
Share This
+ Comment
0
The inquiry into the war in Iraq yesterday heard evidence of how 'patchy' intelligence briefings on WMD were in the lead up to the invasion.

The inquiry into the war in Iraq yesterday heard evidence of how 'patchy' intelligence briefings on WMD were in the lead up to the invasion.

On day two of proceedings of an inquiry into the build up to war, a senior civil servant has said that Britain received intelligence stating some Iraqi weapons may not have been assembled, while lny inks to Al-Qaeda were limited.

RELATED

Britain was told just days before invading Iraq that the country's chemcial weapons might have been unusable, the inquiry into the Iraq war was told yesterday on day two of proceedings.

The inquiry in London heard from senior civil servant William Ehrman that Britain received intelligence "in the very final days before military action" that some Iraqi weapons may not have been assembled.

Foreign Office officials told the inquiry that Saddam Hussein's nuclear programme had, they believed, been dismantled and that they had no evidence of any attempt by Iraq to supply biological weapons to 'terrorists', as the US was claiming at the time.
  
"We did, I think on March 10, get a report that chemical weapons might have remained disassembled and Saddam hadn't yet ordered their assembly...
  
"There was also a suggestion that Iraq might lack warheads capable of effective dispersal of agents", Ehrmann said.
  
Witnesses also downplayed Iraq's chances of building a nuclear weapon and addressed a government claim that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein could launch a strike with weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in 45 minutes.

Ehrmann used adjectives including "patchy", "sporadic" and "limited" to describe a series of intelligence briefings on WMDs between 2000 and 2002.

The inquiry has been criticized in some quarters for having the involvement of too many establishment figures.

Meanwhile, current PM Gordon Brown - another potential witness - denied a claim the probe risks being a whitewash.
  
The leader of the opposition Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg, alleged Brown's government had written to inquiry members outlining nine reasons why its final report could be censored by the government.
  
"How on earth are we...going to hear about the full truth of the decisions leading up to the invasion of Iraq if the inquiry is being suffocated on day one by his government's shameful culture of secrecy?" Clegg demanded.
 

  • Follow us: 
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Youtube

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.