iiNet wins infringement case

04 February 2010 | 09:27:48 AM | Source: AAP/AFP

laptop_0402_B_getty_1745439058

The ruling on iiNet is being closely watched. (Getty Images)

The Federal Court has handed down a landmark ruling in favour of iiNet, finding that the ISP is not responsible for copyright infringements of its users

A consortium of 34 movie studios, headed by Village Roadshow, had hoped to prove iiNet not only failed to take steps to stop illegal file-sharing by customers but breached copyright itself by storing and transmitting the data through its system.

Justice Dennis Cowdroy has found it is "impossible" to hold iiNet responsible for what its users have done in the landmark judgment that may secure the future for all internet service providers (ISPs).

"While I find that iiNet had knowledge of infringements occurring, and did not act to stop them, such findings do not necessitate a finding of authorisation," Justice Cowdroy told the court on Thursday.

"The evidence establishes that iiNet has done no more than to provide an internet service to its users." Justice Cowdroy said it was clear that illegal file downloading was happening on a large and international scale but he could not find against iiNet simply to make a point.

"The evidence establishes that copyright infringement of the applicant's films is occurring on a large scale ... however, such a fact does not necessitate or compel ... a finding of authorisation, merely because it is felt that `something must be done' to stop the infringements," the judge said.

'Copyright cops'

Australian Internet rights groups feared the piracy court case could force Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to become "copyright cops" and cut web access to customers who make illegal downloads.
  
But entertainment companies, including Village Roadshow, Paramount Pictures Australia and Twentieth Century Fox International, said iiNet did not do enough to stop its customers illegally sharing movies on the net.
  
ISP iiNet argued it has never encouraged or authorised the illegal sharing or downloading of files in breach of copyright laws and specifically warned its users against doing so.

ISPs were under mounting pressure to regulate the activities of those who subscribe to their Internet services.
     
BitTorrent websites were hard to shut down while individual file-sharers were too numerous to sue, added Dawes.
  
BitTorrent is a technology that allows online users to share parts of a large file such as a film or song over the Internet. The parts are then stitched together on the end user's computer to create a complete file.
  

     

 

Your Comments

08 Aug 2010 16:27 AEST

thatCALLUMkid

From: bowen.

mmhm

yer your right there, to be honest, many small bands have become big because of downloading.

Agree (0 people agree)
Disagree (0 people disagree)
 

04 Feb 2010 11:31 AEST

Roobar

From: Caribbean

Justice!

Film and record companies don't understand the benefits that illegal downloading is giving them.
Why do you think apple hasn't prevented pirated apps being run on their iPhones? Because they can sell more iPhones, accessories etc.
Film profits are going through the roof because piracy lets their product reach a wider audience, creating more interest in the industry.
Bands support it because people turn up to their concerts and they make nothing from greedy record companies, who charge $30 a cd.

Agree (10 people agree)
Disagree (2 people disagree)
 

Join the Discussion

E.g. Suburb / City
You have characters remaining.
Validation (
) :
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.