Tighten GM labelling laws, Greenpeace says

11 Mar 2010, 2:55 pm   -   Source: AAP
1 Comments
Share This
+ Comment
1

Labelling laws need to be drastically tightened to ensure people are aware of food that is genetically modified, Greenpeace says.

Labelling laws need to be drastically tightened to ensure people are aware of food that is genetically modified, Greenpeace says.

Despite requirements that genetically modified food be labelled, exemptions mean too many Australians are kept in the dark about what is really on their plate.

Greenpeace says the federal government, which is currently reviewing food labelling laws, needs to get strict.

"The reality is that we are eating GM all the time without our knowledge," Greenpeace campaigner Laura Kelly told AAP.

"Exemptions to labelling laws mean that, say, if a food is highly processed, it doesn't need to be labelled, and that applies to a key GM food - canola oil."

Any food that uses canola therefore doesn't require the GM tag.

Ms Kelly said Greenpeace surveys had shown 90 per cent of consumers want clear GM labelling, with "a majority" saying they didn't want to eat those products.

The labelling review is calling for a second round of submissions ahead of a series of public consultations, which are to be held around Australia over the next two months.

Greenpeace has welcomed the breadth of the inquiry, but said the review panel was dudding itself if it thought GM requirement were already up to scratch. In government's policy review released on Friday, it states that "food which has been genetically modified or irradiated must be labelled".

The review is also set to scrutinise the use of Australian-made tags and other labels, including those which claim foods to be `lite', natural or organic.

It will question whether mandatory labels for alcohol should be introduced, or if a national body should be established to oversee the laws.

Food labelling is critical to protecting the health and safety of consumers, the review paper reads.

The Australian Food and Grocery Council said there was nothing wrong with GM labelling, accusing Greenpeace of running a scare campaign.

"To suggest that pigs die of liver cancer if they eat genetically modified canola or food-stock is just scientifically wrong," the council's Kate Carnell said.

Consumers should rest assured all foods with GM traceability are labelled as such, she said.

The industry body has otherwise welcomed the labelling review as an opportunity to provide consumers with more up-to-date, targeted information.

It is calling on the government to back a new process that could see extensive labelling accessible through mobile phones and the scanning of barcodes.

The technology was currently available and could potentially be in place within a year - offering specialised information to those with special concerns, like gluten-intolerance or other allergies.

The review panel is due to deliver its final report in November.

  • Follow us: 
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Youtube

Your Comments

The Facts

wolfgang - from melbourne, 2 years ago

Anyone who is sympathetic towards GMO should read: "Seeds of Destruction" The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation- by F.William Engdahl. Engdahl also wrote ' A Century of War' Anglo-American Oil Politics and The New World Order. Both of these books dovetail in a wonderful way. Highly recommended.

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.