Wall St bill blocked again

28 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm   -   Source: AFP
1 Comments
Share This
+ Comment
1
Obama

Obama "deeply dissapointed" (Getty)

US Senate Republicans have again thwarted Democratic efforts to start formal debate on sweeping legislation to rein in Wall Street excesses.

RELATED

 

Undaunted by the political risks, US Senate Republicans have again thwarted Democratic efforts to start formal debate on sweeping legislation to rein in Wall Street excesses.

For the second time in two days, lawmakers voted 57-41 to take up the popular bill, falling short of the 60 needed to move ahead with the toughest regulatory overhaul of its kind since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

President Barack Obama's Democrats slammed Republicans for blocking legislation backed by nearly two in three Americans amid smoldering anger at fat-cat financiers blamed for the 2008 global economic meltdown.

"Republicans have made it clear whose side they're on: Big banks on Wall Street, not middle-class families," said Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who set the stage for a similar vote on Wednesday.

The vote came as top Goldman Sachs executives faced a barrage of questions and criticism from a key Senate committee over the investment giant's actions in the run up to the collapse, now the subject of a fraud lawsuit.

Republicans, mindful of a potential political price to pay in November mid-term elections for blocking the bill, said they wanted to give back-room negotiations begun last year more time to forge a compromise bill.

Republican Senator Richard Shelby said his talks with Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, a Democrat, had made "considerable progress" in recent days but still faced high hurdles.

Shelby said "the biggest obstacle" was the creation of an "intrusive" consumer financial protection agency reaching beyond Wall Street to "anybody that's dealing with finance", like automobile dealers who offer loans.

"If they will meet us halfway on that, I think we could get a bill," said Shelby, the top Republican on Dodd's panel. "At this hour, to consider that too radical an idea is stunning to me," said Dodd, who warned that if Republicans blocked even the start of debate, "they do so, in my view, at their political peril".

Dodd also said he was prepared to accept an amendment from Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer that he described as saying "no money can be used, no taxpayer money ... for any bailouts at all" of big Wall Street banks.

The Democratic senator's bill would erect a mechanism for dissolving rather than bailing out financial institutions whose collapse could risk crippling the US economy, so called "too big to fail" firms.

The legislation -- which would need to be merged with the bill the House of Representatives passed in 2009 -- would also establish a new agency to protect consumers from abusive lending practices.

The legislation also aims to tighten regulations on the giant market in derivatives -- complex, privately traded instruments tied to the underlying value of a commodity and seen as vehicles for dangerous speculation.

Despite the delay in starting debate, no senators were predicting that the popular measure will die. Democrats and the White House have been eager to portray Republicans as in the pocket of Wall Street, while Republicans say they want tough new rules but that the bill as currently crafted is not ready and must be changed.

"Last night, the Democrat majority forced a vote on a bill that wasn't ready for prime-time," said Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who accused Democrats of being "less interested in fixing this bill than in some political win they think they're scoring by not fixing the bill". Democratic Senator Ben Nelson joined Republicans in both votes.

After Monday's ballot, Obama declared himself "deeply disappointed" and warned against efforts to "water down reform or kill it altogether".

 

  • Follow us: 
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Youtube

Your Comments

blocked?

carol - from usa, 2 years ago

I don't understand how you can say the Republicans have blocked anything. The Democrats have been in full power for 2 years. There were not enough Republican representitives to block anything. This will change in Jan. , but for 2 years the Dems have been able to do / pass anything they like without any consideration or compromise with the Republicans.

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.