Five reasons Australia should stay small

Share This
+ Comment
4
Dr Damien Giurco is Research Director at the UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures.

Dr Damien Giurco is Research Director at the UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures.

Dr Damien Giurco from the Institute for Sustainable Futures believes there are 'smarter paths' for Australia to follow instead of doubling its population.

Dr Damien Giurco from the Institute for Sustainable Futures believes there are 'smarter paths' for Australia to follow instead of doubling its population. Here is why:

1. What do we mean by big?

Australia needs to question what it would mean to be big and why this is desirable. Do we mean a big population to increase global influence instead of educating bigger brains to be respected for smarter ideas? Do we mean bigger immigration so we can expand the working population to feed our bigger waistlines or to generate more consumers for bigger corporate profits? These aren’t good enough reasons for a big Australia. Or could we mean a bigger heart for refugees and a bigger vision for Australia’s future?

2. Reduce footprint before feet

Our world needs to embrace more ethical and sustainable patterns of living; the impacts of our consumption are too high and others have too little. Population growth is only half the story – both what and how much we consume have a huge influence. Did you know that Australia’s carbon dioxide emissions are about the same as Indonesia’s? Indonesia has more than 230 million people and we have almost 23 million but our footprint per person is ten times higher. We must acknowledge our history of how we got to where we are today – will we always seek to define our status by what we buy?

3.  Older, slower, exhausted in 2050

In 1990 a typical Australian was about 32 years old, in 2010 they’re 37 years old. Together with an ageing population, our cities are increasingly choked in traffic and we don’t have a strategy for putting money from the mining boom into infrastructure and innovation that will underpin the prosperity of our cities and regions beyond the boom. What will Australia be good at in 2050? Where is our vision for the future? In the short term, urban and rural Australians need better planning for transport, energy and water services – doubling our population would increase challenges we are already struggling to meet as well as further degrading our environment.

4. Creating a resource efficient future

The simplistic days of bigger meaning better are fading – from the excesses of Wall Street to the limits of one planet – tomorrow’s money will be made by finding new ways to do more with less. Promoting a bigger population for Australia is like trying to solve our problems by doing more of the same. For Australia to be a wise and nimble player in the transition to a new and resource-efficient global economy, we must seize the initiative on pursuing excellence, beginning with education. History and language should be prioritized alongside science and technology, recognizing the strength in our cultural landscape to generate and implement ideas which help us prosper in tomorrow’s world.

5. Australia Unlimited

Creativity and wisdom, leadership and opportunity, ingenuity and resilience – rather than a big population – let these be the qualities which underpin and define the future we share.

Your Comments

Numbers do matter

Jenny Goldie - from Michelago, 7 months ago

I'm the first to argue that Australia needs a small, not a large, population but I'm not sure this article really gives the definitive reasons as to why. Dr Giurco is at pains to be humane but motherhood statements about refugees seem at odds with his small Australia view. Yes, we do indeed need to reduce consumption but peopple everywhere have basic needs that must be met and supplying the needs of seven billion may be all the planet can cope with. There's no room for further population growth

A different argument?

Harry - from Sydney, 7 months ago

I don't disagree with the numerous advantages of being a smaller country as can be seen by the successes of Singapore and Israel, however, none of the points Damien raised are arguments against a big size. We need young population growth so that we can avoid the detrimental effects of our ageing population but too much population isn't as much of a problem as where we would be without it. More discussion is needed, not useless facts.

Refugees?

Quinten - from Brisbane, 7 months ago

This is a sensible argument, but some may take it as a justification for the horrible way we treat refugees. Australia can afford to have a bigger population, and we should take this as a cue to expand our humanitarian involvement. That involves allowing more refugees in in the short term, and working to resolve international conflicts and crises in the long term to eliminate "push" factors. And perhaps we should all give vegetarianism/veganism a try?

At last!!

MattM - from Queensland, 7 months ago

Well said Damien!!. It is astonishing that despite growing overwhelming evidence that we are spiraling into a country with a large population with little or no real wealth and decreasing ability to produce the food we need let alone help others. I really wish policy was guided by this: http://www.australianpoet.com/boundless.html rather than the wishing of those who believe in the "bigger is better" fallacy. We are either at or past the sweet spot (I'd argue past) Vote1 Stable Population Party

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.