Accused says Khmer Rouge not 'bad people'

Share This
+ Comment
1
'Brother Number Two' Nuon Chea is seen as the chief ideologue of the brutal 1970s movement. (Getty)

'Brother Number Two' Nuon Chea is seen as the chief ideologue of the brutal 1970s movement. (Getty)

Cambodia's UN-backed war crimes tribunal has begun hearing evidence, with 'Brother Number Two' Nuon Chea saying the Khmer Rouge weren't bad people.

The Khmer Rouge were not 'bad people', the regime's highest-ranking surviving member said as Cambodia's UN-backed war crimes tribunal began hearing evidence in a long-awaited atrocities trial.

"Brother Number Two" Nuon Chea, seen as the chief ideologue of the brutal 1970s movement, was the first of three accused to face questioning from judges in the proceedings.

The trial is seen as vital to finding some justice over the country's "Killing Fields" era, when up to two million people died. Hundreds of Cambodians packed the Phnom Penh courtroom on Monday to see Nuon Chea in the dock.

"I don't want the next generations to misunderstand the history," the 85-year-old said, without reading from a prepared statement.

"I don't want them to misunderstand that the Khmer Rouge are bad people, are criminals. Nothing is true about that," he said, adding that he wanted to fight injustice. He blamed Vietnamese aggressors for Cambodia's suffering.

Nuon Chea and his co-defendants - former foreign minister Ieng Sary and ex-head of state Khieu Samphan - deny charges of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.

Led by "Brother Number One" Pol Pot, who died in 1998, the Khmer Rouge emptied cities and abolished money and religion. In their bid to create an agrarian utopia, they also wiped out nearly a quarter of Cambodia's population through starvation, overwork and execution.

"It was Vietnam who killed Cambodians," Nuon Chea told the court, without clarifying which period in history he was referring to.

He also pointed the finger at rogue elements, or "bandits", who had infiltrated the Khmer Rouge before the movement came to power and were responsible for arrests and mass purges.

Fearing that not all of the ailing accused, who are in their 80s, would live to see a verdict, the court recently split their complex case into a series of smaller trials.

In this first session, it will focus only on the forced movement of the population and related crimes against humanity.

"I have devoted myself to serving the country," Pol Pot's right-hand man told the court. He added that he first became interested in communism while studying in Thailand in the late 1940s when he noticed that "injustice was everywhere".

Khieu Samphan is expected to give evidence in the trial, the court's second, at some point in the next two weeks. He has previously said he was a patriot who was unaware mass killings were going on.

Ieng Sary has stated that he does not wish to testify during his trial.

Absent from the proceedings is fourth co-accused Ieng Thirith - the regime's "First Lady" and the only female leader to be charged by the court. Last month she was ruled unfit for trial because she has dementia.

In its first trial, the tribunal last year sentenced Khmer Rouge jailer Duch to 30 years in jail for overseeing the deaths of some 15,000 people. The case is now under appeal.

Your Comments

The US backed the Khmer Rouge

Billy Thorn - from Cairns, 6 months ago

Will the US be questioned about the twelve years they backed the Khmer Rouge after they were forced onto the Thai - Cambodia border by the Vietnamese? After Pol Pot was driven out in 1979 the US funded them, as a guerilla army, to attack targets within Vietnam controlled Cambodia. Even the UN recognised Pol Pot's regime as the legitimate government of Cambodia. It seems the killing of 2-5,000,000 people is OK as long as you're the enemy of the USA's enemies.

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.