West clashes with Russia over Syria

1 Feb 2012, 10:49 am   -   Source: AFP
5 Comments

This video has expired

We're sorry but this video has expired. You may find another one to watch on the right or click here to return to the video page.

Share This
+ Comment
5

Western powers clashed with Russia at the United Nations as they pushed for a UN resolution demanding the resignation of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and an end to what the United States called his 'reign of terror.' 

RELATED

Western powers clashed with Russia at the United Nations as they pushed for a UN resolution demanding the resignation of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and an end to what the United States called his 'reign of terror.'

The diplomatic showdown at the United Nations came as fighting escalated between Syrian government forces and rebels, and a senior US official predicted that Assad would be toppled sooner or later.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, backed by British Foreign Secretary William Hague, French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe and Arab League representatives, led the charge for a UN resolution on the crisis.

Under the measure, Assad would be ordered to halt a crackdown that the UN says has killed more than 5,400 people in 10 months. He would also hand power to his deputy.

"We all know that change is coming to Syria. Despite its ruthless tactics, the Assad regime's reign of terror will end," Clinton said.

"The question for us is how many more innocent civilians will die before this country is able to move forward."

Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim Al-Thani, speaking on behalf of the Arab League, said the UN had to stop Assad's "killing machine."

While there is no threat of use of force in the resolution, Russia -- which has veto power on the Security Council -- opposes what it sees as a backdoor effort to implement regime change.

Moscow's ambassador to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, argued that Syria should "be able to decide for itself" and said the Council "cannot impose the parameters for an internal settlement. It simply does not have the mandate to do so."

Earlier, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said during a trip to Australia that Russia did not want to be "asking people to step down. Regime change is not our profession."

The text of the resolution, seen by AFP, calls for the formation of a unity government leading to "transparent and free elections," while stressing there will be no foreign military intervention in Syria as there was in Libya, helping to topple Moamer Kadhafi.

Nevertheless, Russia's deputy foreign minister, Gennady Gatilov, said the resolution would be a "path towards civil war" in the increasingly divided country.

In Washington, US intelligence chief James Clapper said the fall of the Assad regime was in any case inevitable.

"I do not see how he can sustain his rule of Syria," Clapper, the director of national intelligence, told senators.

"I personally believe it's a question of time but that's the issue, it could be a long time."

Syria remained defiant. At the United Nations, the Syrian ambassador, Bashar Jaafari, said his country "will stand firm in confronting its enemies."

In a defiant speech, Jaafari accused the alliance of Western powers and Arab League states of "double standards" and of "fomenting the crisis."

But the opposition Syrian National Council deplored the international community's lack of "swift action" to protect civilians "by all necessary means," in a statement on Facebook.

The SNC, the most representative group opposed to Assad, reaffirmed the "people's determination to fight for their freedom and dignity," stressing they "will not give up their revolution, whatever the sacrifices."

The head of the now-defunct Arab League observer mission to Syria, General Mohammed Ahmed Mustafa al-Dabi, said there had been a marked upsurge in violence in the past week.

On Monday alone, almost 100 people, including 55 civilians, were killed during a regime assault on the flashpoint city of Homs, said the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

On Tuesday, at least 22 people were killed, all but one of them civilians, the Observatory said.

The rebel Free Syrian Army said half of the country was now effectively a no-go zone for the security forces.

"Fifty percent of Syrian territory is no longer under the control of the regime," its Turkey-based commander Colonel Riyadh al-Asaad told AFP.

He said the morale of government troops was extremely low. "That's why they are bombing indiscriminately, killing men, women and children," he said.

CIA director David Petraeus told senators in Washington that Assad now faced challenges in Damascus and Aleppo, two cities that had been seen as insulated from the unrest.

"I think it has shown indeed how substantial the opposition to the regime is and how it is in fact growing and how increasing areas are becoming beyond the reach of the regime security forces," Petraeus said.

  • Follow us: 
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Youtube

Your Comments

Syria has been a Russian client state for decades

Paul - from Darwin, 4 months ago

So it's only fair that the Russkies are backing up the in situ regime. But a change in Syria is well overdue, even if it's going to be opposed by Russia and Iran. Russia to shore up a customer and Iran to shore up another buffer state against the West and ensure there are other targets of Western ire other than themselves.

Let them eat cake

prospero - from sydney, 4 months ago

Not suprising that an article like this draws the US-haters out. Am I wrong to asume that these people are for democratic reform in said dictatorships? Do you think the revolutions of France and Britain were happy bloodless affiars? As for secret imperialistic agendas the US has nothing on Russia. You think Russia wants another democracy on its doorstep to show their people how to stand up to gangster government? Of course they protest as they might well be the next domino.

And on the seventh day, God gave us McDonalds

Narelle - from Bega, 4 months ago

The US have initiated the 'Domino Theory' in the Middle East for their own ends. That the US together with the UN still have any credibility is astounding. Fabricating reasons for intervening in other countries affairs always on 'humanitarian grounds' then preceding to invade and destroy a country and massacre the very people they are supposedly there to liberate. Meanwhile Israel with the backing of the US have Iran in their sights. And Russia has the hide to disagree!!!!!!

Communication breakdown..

Tim - from Adelaide, 4 months ago

If Russia had any sense, they'd be in contact with the rebels to make contacts for new sales... but maybe the west has beat them to it... :)

False piety

Rashid - from WA, 4 months ago

Is it not remarkable that the Sherriff Sec. of State should ask the question “ how many civilians “ lives will be lost before this terror ends! Her country has waged terror in most part of the world and untold numbers of civilians has died and dyeing on daily basis without any end in sight for its actions for decades! It is not difficult at all to speculate the part the US is playing in Syria and the region as a whole. Pontificate she might but no body should be fooled with this false piety.

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.