Apple settles iPad trademark in China: Court

2 Jul 2012, 7:14 pm   -   Source: AFP
Share This
0 
+ Comment
0
The Chinese firm demanded $400million but Apple managed to settle the dispute for $60 million (File/Getty).

The Chinese firm demanded $400million but Apple managed to settle the dispute for $60 million (File/Getty).

US technology giant Apple has paid a Chinese firm $60 million to settle a long-running dispute over the iPad trademark in China, a court said.

RELATED

US technology giant Apple has paid a Chinese firm $60 million to settle a long-running dispute over the iPad trademark in China, a court said Monday.
  
The government body overseeing trademarks has been asked to immediately recognise Apple's rights to the iPad name, the High Court of the southern province of Guangdong said on its website.
  
Apple last week paid $60 million to settle the dispute, according to the statement -- well below the $400 million the Chinese firm had demanded.
  
"This means that the dispute between Apple and Shenzhen Proview over the rights to the iPad brand is resolved in a satisfactory manner," the court statement said.
  
Both Proview Technology, based in the southern city of Shenzhen, and Apple had claimed ownership of the Chinese rights to the "iPad" trademark and were locked in a legal battle.
  
Proview's Taiwanese affiliate registered "iPad" as a trademark in several countries including China as early as 2000 -- years before Apple began selling its hugely successful tablet computer.
  
Apple subsequently bought the rights for the global trademark -- including from the Taiwanese affiliate -- but Proview said the deal did not include the rights for mainland China, and sued after the iPad was launched.
  
It is rare for a Chinese enterprise to accuse an overseas firm of trademark breaches -- although foreign companies frequently complain of intellectual property rights violations in China.
  
A lawyer for Proview, Xie Xianghui, said the debt-ridden Chinese company had originally sought $400 million in compensation for giving up the rights but settled for the lower amount out of "practical" considerations.
  
"We previously hoped that the compensation would be $400 million, so that it would be enough to pay back all the debts," Xie told AFP on Monday.
  
"We have to say it is the practical choice. It is a comprehensive settlement and the end of the lawsuit in mainland China."
  
Xie said Proview felt "pressure" to settle, though he declined to say why.
  
"Court mediation gave us some pressure," he said.
  
Proview had previously sought bans on iPad sales in China and blocks on imports into and exports out of the country.
  
The legal battle did not halt sales of the iPad through Apple's five retail stores in mainland China, a hugely valuable market for the US company.
  
But Chinese media reported that local officials had seized scores of iPads in at least two cities, and the resolution of the case should clear the way for Apple to sell the iPad free of any trademark concerns.
  
The US tech giant last year took Proview to court in China itself, claiming trademark infringement, but a court ruled Apple lacked "supporting facts and evidence" for its claim.
  
Apple is wildly popular in China, where die-hard fans have been known to line up for days to get their hands on its latest offerings.
  
Greater China -- which includes Hong Kong and Taiwan -- has become Apple's fastest-growing region, with revenues second only to the United States.
  
Apple officials were not immediately available for comment on Monday's announcement.
  

Ipad , Apple Corp , Made In China

  • Follow us: 
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Youtube

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.