Extreme weather linked to climate change: study

Share This
+ Comment
5
The report is accompanied for the first time by a separate analysis that explains how climate change may have influenced certain key events, from droughts in the US and Africa to extreme cold and warm spells in Britain. (AFP)

The report is accompanied for the first time by a separate analysis that explains how climate change may have influenced certain key events, from droughts in the US and Africa to extreme cold and warm spells in Britain. (AFP)

Severe droughts, floods and heat waves rocked the world last year as greenhouse gas levels climbed, boosting the odds of some extreme weather events, international scientists said.

Severe droughts, floods and heat waves rocked the world last year as greenhouse gas levels climbed, boosting the odds of some extreme weather events, international scientists said.
  
The details are contained in the annual State of the Climate report, compiled by nearly 400 scientists from 48 countries and published in the peer-reviewed Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.
  
The report itself remains "consciously conservative" when it comes to attributing the causes of certain weather events to climate change, and instead refers only to widely understood phenomena such as La Nina.
  
However, it is accompanied for the first time by a separate analysis that explains how climate change may have influenced certain key events, from droughts in the US and Africa to extreme cold and warm spells in Britain.
  
"2011 was notable for many extreme weather and climate events. La Nina played a key role in many, but certainly not all of them," said Tom Karl, director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s National Climatic Center.
  
Last year was among the 15 warmest since records began in the late 1800s, and the Arctic warmed at about twice the rate of lower latitudes with sea ice at below average levels, according to the report.
  
Greenhouse gases from human pollution sources like coal and gas reached a new high, with carbon dioxide emissions exceeding 390 parts per million -- up 2.10 parts per million from 2010 -- for the first time since modern records began.
  
Despite the natural cooling trend brought by back-to-back La Nina effects, which chill waters in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean, 2011 was among the 12 highest years on record for global sea surface temperatures.
  
The double La Nina punch influenced many of the world's significant weather events, like historic droughts in East Africa, the southern US and northern Mexico, said the report.
  
La Nina trends also were associated with the wettest two years on record in Australia.
  
An accompanying analysis in the same journal, titled "Explaining Extreme Events," examined the links between human-driven climate change and six selected weather crises in 2011, including the Texas drought that lasted half the year.
  
The authors found that "such a heat wave is now around 20 times more likely during a La Nina year than it was during the 1960s," said Peter Stott, climate monitoring and attribution team leader at the UK Met Office.
  
"We have shown that climate change has indeed altered the odds of some of the events that have occurred," he told reporters. "What we are saying here is we can actually quantify those changing odds."
  
Looking at Britain's unusually warm November 2011 and the cold snap of December 2010, scientists found that frigid Decembers are half as likely to occur now compared to 50 years ago, and hot Novembers are 62 times more likely.
  
However, a close look at the floods along the Chao Phraya River that swamped Thailand last year showed that climate change was not to blame, but rather human activities increased construction along the flood plain.
  
The damage caused by the floods was unprecedented, but the amount of rain that actually fell "was not very unusual," said the analysis by experts from NOAA and Britain's Met Office along with international colleagues.
  
While it remains hard to link single events to human-caused climate change, "scientific thinking has moved on and now it is widely accepted that attribution statements about individual weather or climate events are possible," the report added.
  
The key is analyzing to what extent climate change may be boosting the odds of extreme weather, said the report, likening the phenomenon to a baseball player who takes steroids and then starts getting 20 percent more hits than before.
  
Scientists can consider steroids as the likely cause for the increase in hits, but must still take care to account for natural variability in the player's swing.
 

Your Comments

Mr

Tony stapley - from Two Rocks WA, 10 months ago

The scientists say that there is a high probability that man made climate change will have some nasty effects for our planet. The supporters of the fossle fuel industry are 100% sure there is no such thing, please tell me how thay can be so sure. The asbestos industry said the same about cancer, the tabaco indusry said the same thay are driven by money.

If the climate isn't warming or cooling it's time for a dose of "extreme weather"

Bill Koutalianos - from Sydney, 11 months ago

Based on past climate alarmism it's probably best to run with the base report which is "consciously conservative". However that approach isn't very newsworthy so for the first time ever it is accompanied by a separate analysis filled with all sorts of speculation qualified by words like "may", "hard to link", "possible". So if we accept the claim that "Last year was among the 15 warmest" it sounds like the satellite global temperature data is correct in indicating a slight cooling over 15 years.

reality

Mark - from moonta, 11 months ago

Yes climate change is real and yes it is man made and yes it is to late and yes it is the fault of all political leaders globaly.But lets hope our great grand children dont hate us to much for sitting on our backsides and doing nothing.

John you are talking nonsense

Dr Dodds - from Perth, 11 months ago

I don't even know where to begin with your statement.. Year 10 physics would be a good start.

Common Sense Scientist

John Dodds - from DeeWhy and San Francisco, 11 months ago

What garbage. IPCC says sunlight is the sole source of energy into the Earth. So the Moon and planets can not cause eccentricty, the moon can't cause tidal energy. The IPCC is scientifically STUPID. They ignore the reallity that sunlight pushes the Earth out but gravity causes a circular orbit. The IPCC is not scientifically sound.

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.