Radio News Bulletin
- Latest Bulletin
Thu 23rd May 2013 6:42PM - Featured Stories
Wed 30th Nov -0001 12:00AM - London attack shocks UK
Thu 23rd May 2013 12:00AM - Australia under fire in human rights report
Thu 23rd May 2013 12:00AM - Australians 'oppose gambling ads in sport'
Thu 23rd May 2013 12:00AM
Promote Advertisement
Steffensen accuses Athletics Aust of racial vilification
Commonwealth Games gold medallist John Steffensen. (AAP)
Commonwealth Games gold medallist John Steffensen has stepped up his attack on Athletics Australia, accusing them of racial vilification while vowing to boycott the London Olympics.
Dual Commonwealth Games gold medallist John Steffensen has stepped up his attack on Athletics Australia (AA), accusing them of racial vilification while vowing to boycott the London Olympics.
Steffensen on Friday threatened to sit out the Games and not be part of the 4x400m men's relay in protest at teenager Steve Solomon receiving an individual 400m spot.
The controversial runner went one step further in an incredible tirade on Channel 9 on Saturday morning, saying he has been racially vilified by AA.
"I don't think it helps the legitimacy of our sport or the selection criteria, and I think it only makes our sport look stupid," he said of AA's decision to name the 19-year-old Solomon ahead of him for the one-lap race.
"The rules and the goalposts are getting shifted. Now they're going to pick who they want to put in the team.
"I've put up with being racially vilified by this federation, being discriminated against on many teams.
"...You think I waste my time running at training for fun? For this?
"No, they can have athletics. I don't need to do this no more."
Steffensen didn't back down when asked about AA's alleged racism.
"Read between the lines. I don't really have to explain anything to you," he said.
"You know it would help if I was a different colour.
"A lot of my decisions with my federation would be totally different.
"But I've never brought that up. I've always kept quiet on that. Because people aren't really going to want to hear that sort of stuff.
"But it is the fact. It is the way it is. But I live with it and I keep running and keep representing my country.
"People say I got to run faster. If I'm not running fast enough - what are you saying about the boys behind me in my country?
"You saying they're not good enough? For me, I'm done."
The national sporting body confirmed on Friday night in London that Solomon was the only runner eligible to run the 400m despite neither he or Steffensen meeting the automatic qualifying time of 45.3 seconds.
AA has the power to choose one athlete with a B qualifier in the event, a standard reached by Solomon and Steffensen.
They have both already been picked for the 4x400m relay.
Even if Steffensen were to back down on his threat to boycott the Olympics, his comments are certain to create tension within the Australian camp not to mention the 4x400m men's relay.
"I didn't make the qualification. You never heard of me in these last six months. I didn't say nothing," Steffensen said.
"I was going to run the relay and go home and do the right thing by the sport.
"Now I'm saying something because they're not doing the right thing by me.
"And at age 30 and the amount of years and effort I've put into the sport, the medals - everything I've done for the sport - I deserve a little bit of respect."
Solomon burst into contention for the individual run by posting a career-best 45.52s at the world junior championships in Barcelona this week.
Steffensen, who set his best time for the year of 45.61s in February in Sydney, defeated Solomon at the Olympic trial in March before suffering a hamstring injury that has plagued his London preparations.
Your Comments
Lost message
Steffensen has a point. If he beat Solomon in their sport then he should have been chosen. And it is possible his race works against him. However by delivering his message in an emotional way he loses credibility. Racism is an evolving cultural phenomenon. We will never get rid of it. But the targets of racism and the way it is expressed may change. Eg being more implicit (being overlooked for a spot with the olympic team because you don't look australian) instead of explicit racism (such as name calling).
mr
John Steffensen is an athlete with limited talent but a big talent for being a blubbering big mouthed whinging whining goose. Steffensen is the stereotypical sore looser. Hopefully he doesn't go London. He had success at the 2006 Melbourne Commonwealth Games. Gold medals in the 400m 4x400m relay. He was already a nauseating winner. His many claims of racism are puerile rants with no substance. Asked point blank to say what they are he carnt offer an answer
fair point, but not the way i would express it
take the racial rubbish away and he does have a point. clear rules are in place for all. a trial was held in which the winner should get an exemption if one was going to be handed out. neither athlete made the grade but the person who came third to be elevated above those clearly in front of him when it counted based on one performance. (lets face it by a very small number .09sec) is indeed not in the best interest of a fair playing field. an Olympic berth is a big deal, AA lose all credibility
Passion or racism?
Nice to have a passion in your sport but really, have Solomon or Steffensen got any chance of a medal with a best time of 45.52? Steffensen has made this out a racial issue and I say that people that falsely accuse should feel the full weight of the law the accused would have felt had they been convicted, in this case probably a heavy fine. It is too easy to pull out the "I'm being racially victimised" card and very difficult to defend the accusation.
VideoNEW
Podcasts
Blogs


