Top Stories
Rockets hit southern Beirut
Four people were wounded when two rockets exploded in the
Shiite-majority Hezbollah heartland of south Beirut, hours after Hezbollah's Hassan Nasrallah pledged to back Syria's President Assad.
- Sydney's lederhosen out for football final
- Live betting odds to be banned: PM
- Suspected Maoist rebels kill 28 in India
- The indigenous history of our railways
- Police cautious on stabbed soldier links
- Sorry Day marked across country
- Laughter's the medicine - but what's it for?
- Three more arrests over London murder
- 12 dead in clash with Philippine militants
-
-
The indigenous history of Australia's railways
26 May 13 | 1:00
-
-
Aussie Germans rise early for football clash
26 May 13 | 1:00
-
-
SBS 10:30 News - 24 May part 1
24 May 13 | 14:00
-
-
SBS 10:30 News - 24 May part 2
24 May 13 | 11:00
-
-
SBS 10:30 News - 24 May part 3
24 May 13 | 3:00
-
-
Syrian refugees building new lives
24 May 13 | 2:00
-
-
The disturbing pattern of Islamist terror
24 May 13 | 2:00
-
-
NSW Police warn of 3D gun dangers
24 May 13 | 1:00
-
-
Insight: Fat Fighters - Dorothy and Jenny on accepting their bodies
24 May 13 | 1:00
-
-
Living Black: S18 Ep12 preview
24 May 13 | 1:00
-
-
Insight: Fat Fighters - Kate on drastic ways to lose weight
24 May 13 | 0:00
-
-
International photo exhibit launches in Sydney
24 May 13 | 2:14
-
-
Obama addresses counter-terrorism
24 May 13 | 1:00
-
-
Analysis: Brutal London 'terror' attack
23 May 13 | 6:00
-
-
Robbie Deans extended interview
20 May 13 | 5:00
-
-
Syria refugees face Lebanon sanitation issues
20 May 13 | 2:00
-
-
Lebanon provides schooling for Syria refugees
20 May 13 | 2:00
-
-
Denmark claims Eurovision Contest
20 May 13 | 2:00
-
-
Do companies have the right to patent human genes?
20 May 13 | 2:00
-
-
Budget analysis: Shane Oliver extended interview
15 May 13 | 7:00
-
-
What the budget means for the economy
14 May 13 | 2:14
-
-
Budget summary: Karen Middleton reports
14 May 13 | 1:00
-
-
Behind the scenes of the federal budget
14 May 13 | 0:00
-
-
Photography exhibition chronicles Indigenous culture
13 May 13 | 2:00
-
-
Rooftop beekeeping on the rise in Australia
13 May 13 | 2:00
-
-
NDIS : Rosemary King extended interview
13 May 13 | 3:00
-
-
Indigenous thriller opens SSF: Aaron Pedersen Interview
09 May 13 | 2:00
-
-
In Conversation: High Speed Rail
09 May 13 | 4:00
-
-
Indigenous thriller opens SSF: Hugo Weaving Interview
09 May 13 | 1:00
-
-
SA makes historical appeal reforms
06 May 13 | 2:00
Radio News Bulletin
- Latest Bulletin
Fri 24th May 2013 2:39PM - Featured Stories
Wed 30th Nov -0001 12:00AM - National strategy to cut Indigenous suicide
Fri 24th May 2013 12:00AM - New ASIO assessments review needed
Fri 24th May 2013 12:00AM - How does betting affect kids' view of sport?
Fri 24th May 2013 12:00AM
Blogs
More Blogs-
-
Hate Crime Murder on a busy New York Street.
22 May 2013, 11:14 AM
-
-
End of parity: Experts say A$ heading south
17 May 2013, 18:13 PM
-
-
The winning costs of Eurovision 2013
14 May 2013, 17:40 PM
- At-a-glance: Same-sex marriage around the world
- Video of US plane crash in Afghanistan believed to be authentic
- Analysis: 'Illegals' and the erosion of empathy
- Xenophon warns of Malaysia election fraud
- Malaysian elections expose serious divides
- India sex crime laws not tough enough: UN
- Labor to take disability tax rise to poll
- Family's plea: Aussie facing Saudi terrorism charges
- Is Tony Abbott wrong to talk of 'illegals'?
- Will Malaysians vote for change?
- At-a-glance: Same-sex marriage around the world
- Is Tony Abbott wrong to talk of 'illegals'?
- Comment: Why are we debating 'blackface' in 2013?
- Murrawarri people take sovereignty campaign to UN
- Polio survivor: I wish there had been a vaccine
- Comment: Wait, there are riots in Sweden?
- The rise of Greece's Golden Dawn party
- Made in Bangladesh 'a label of concern'
- Analysis: 'Illegals' and the erosion of empathy
- Comment: Saving Australian manufacturing
Promote Advertisement
Why making China ‘The Boogeyman’ won’t work
US lawmakers advocated burning the US Olympic team's Chinese-made uniforms. Minxin Pei separates political grandstanding from hard reality.
These days it is rare to see Congressional Republicans and Democrats unified on anything, much less speak with one voice. But when they do, the result is not necessarily good.
This seems to be the case when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (both Democrats), House Speaker John Boehner (Republican) and several other Senators and Congressmen loudly condemned the U.S. Olympic Committee’s decision to use China-made clothing designed by Ralph Lauren, a sponsor of the U.S. Olympic Committee, for the London Olympics. Senator Harry Reid even called on the U.S. Olympic Committee to burn China-made uniforms.
These American politicians may think bashing China during hard times in the U.S. before an election is good political strategy. By showing America’s unemployed workers that they feel their pain, they could get their votes in November. In reality, however, the same politicians must know that blaming China for America’s economic woes will not alleviate the suffering of ordinary Americans.
To be sure, Congress has a constitutional right to weigh in on American foreign policy and its past intervention in matters related to Washington’s China policy, when conducted in close cooperation with the White House, occasionally produced positive effects on U.S.-China relations. But seizing China-made uniforms for Team USA as a political issue and using irresponsible, if not hysterical, rhetoric to inflame public opinion not only justifies the contempt of Congress held by people in the U.S. and around the world, but also undermines America’s long-term China strategy.
Such gratuitous China-bashing is, needless to say, hypocritical. The loss of blue-collar workers in general, and workers in the textile industry in particular, is caused primarily by technological progress and market forces, and not by China. Even if Team USA’s uniforms were not made in China, they would be made in Vietnam, Indonesia, or India, but not in North Carolina.
Another glaring instance of hypocrisy in such inflammatory rhetoric is that these politicians may not have thought about the consequences should they fully enforce their demand of not buying China-made goods. Should they lead by example, rather than pick on the U.S. Olympic Committee? Were they to do so, they might have to come to work practically naked. They would have to incinerate their cherished iPhones, iPads, and Macbook Airs (all made in China) as well. They would have to invite the press to inspect their homes to ensure that nothing there is made in China. What about their families? Should their children and grandchildren be denied the pleasures of China-made gadgets and toys? It is doubtful whether they are ever prepared to be truly faithful to their beliefs.
In terms of the harm done by such political insanity on Washington’s long-term strategy toward China, political hypocrisy is the least of our worries. The sad spectacle of Congressional leaders piling on each other to rail against the use of China-made Olympic uniforms simply reinforces the suspicion held by the Chinese public that the American political establishment harbors deep hostility toward China and does not wish to see it strong and prosperous. Obviously, such behavior is a god-send for the ruling Chinese Communist Party, which has been quite effective in convincing average Chinese citizens that the United States has a containment strategy against China.
To the extent that America’s long-term China strategy critically depends on a fundamental change of China’s domestic political system, an essential component of this strategy should consist of steps taken to win the hearts and minds of the Chinese population. For a country that spent hundreds of billions of dollars and lost several thousand young men and women scrambling to win hearts and minds of more than 50 million Iraqis and Afghans, it is strategic madness to alienate 1.3 billion people with irresponsible and insensitive remarks that will be remembered for a long time. For once, Washington politicians may have truly “hurt the feelings of the Chinese people,” a much-derided phrase frequently used by spokesmen of the Chinese Foreign Ministry.
Cheap and irresponsible China-bashing is counterproductive to the long-term American strategy because it is sure to inflame Chinese nationalism, a powerful emotional force that could be deftly exploited by the ruling Communist Party to maintain its power. Most ordinary Chinese people are not sophisticated enough to distinguish Congressional rhetoric from substantive American policy, nor can they easily separate political hypocrisy from genuine commitment. When the Chinese media plays up such anti-China rhetoric coming from some of America’s most powerful politicians, one can bet that it will elicit instinctive and strong anti-American feelings from ordinary Chinese.
Of course, no sensible policy-makers in Washington want to turn the Chinese people into enemies of the United States. If anything, they prefer to see them mobilize and pressure their government for more democracy, free markets, and human rights.
Given the short supply of common sense in Congress, we can only expect such self-destructive behavior to continue. Goodwill toward the United States among the Chinese people will decline. Rising anti-Americanism will become a political asset of the Chinese Communist Party in persuading mainstream Chinese that the best political system to defend China’s national honor is the current regime, not a democracy championed by or allied with the United States.
It is doubtful whether Congressional leaders are aware of the calamitous strategic consequences of their habitually senseless behavior. It is even more doubtful whether they are capable of learning anything from their own mistakes – since they spend the bulk of their waking hours chasing campaign money to keep their own jobs secure.
Related posts:
Your Comments
But you are yourself also misguided
Mark - from Sydney, 10 months ago
Umm ... but sir, you yourself are also a bit out of touch with reality. If these senseless rhetorics would cause "instinctive and strong anti-American feelings" from the Chinese public (which I think it probably will), it would come from the US Congress and the American media, *NOT* the Chinese government as you are suggesting. All the Chinese government needs to do is show the news. I don't see why that is supposed to be an evil act.
VideoNEW
Podcasts
Blogs


