High Court rules ASIO refugee powers invalid

Share This
+ Comment
4
(AAP)

(AAP)

 The High Court has ruled an asylum seeker deemed a security risk can still be granted a refugee visa.

The High Court has ruled an asylum seeker deemed a security risk can still be granted a refugee visa.

In a decision on Friday, a majority of High Court judges overturned a regulation which specifies that an asylum seeker deemed a security risk by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) can't be granted a protection visa.

The decision has important implications for a group of about 50 people, mostly Sri Lankans, given adverse ASIO security assessments and who are in indefinite detention in Australia.

Because they have been deemed security risks, they can't be sent back to their home country and neither can they go to any third country.

In overturning the regulation made under the Migration Act, the judges held that the decision to refuse to grant a protection visa to the Sri Lankan man, identified only as M47, was illegal.

M47, a former member of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, arrived in Australian in December 2009 and has been in immigration detention since then.

He applied for a protection visa in June 2010 with immigration officials finding he had a well-founded fear of persecution in Sri Lanka and was therefore a refugee.

But a protection visa was refused after ASIO assessed him as a security risk. His lawyers challenged both the refusal to grant a protection visa and his ongoing detention, arguing he was denied procedural fairness.

The High Court found he was not denied procedural fairness with regard to the ASIO assessment as he was given the opportunity to address concerns raised by ASIO.

But the judges also held that migration regulations could not validly prescribe public interest as a condition for the grant of a protection visa, as that was inconsistent with the Migration Act.

That meant the refusal to grant a visa was not made according to law. However his continued detention for the purpose of determining his application for a protection visa was valid, the judges said.

Your Comments

mr

bill banter - from brisbane, 2 months ago

Easy. Renounce our signature to the UN Convention. It is old fashioned formulated in 1951 in a context for Europe. Australia would be well rid of it and using our own definition of humanitarian and protection visas, WITH a character test and security assessment.

National Interest first!

Shazza - from IC, 8 months ago

UN refugee convention doesn't grant protection to fighters so this guy would be excluded from UNHCR status determination process. So, why should Aus grant him protection to a known terrorist and a high ranking LTTE? Same applies to the 50 others. ALP should never have brought people on the Oceanic Viking to Aus shorse now they live of us for free, access to the highest court of the nation and assistance of lawyers. Change the government, stop funding RILC and David Mann immediately. Deport them.

Disgusted

Mell - from Perth, 9 months ago

What do we have ASIO for if a judge can just throw out their advise and warnings, this country is taking in criminals and Australian public have no say it is about time we did. For me if ASIO has said no then they should be deported

Great!!

Ryan - from Earth, 9 months ago

Well I hope if those security risks decide to do anything stupid it's that panel of judges that cops it!!

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.