David Hicks terrorism charge found invalid

Share This
+ Comment
1
Chief prosecutor on Hicks' charge:

Chief prosecutor on Hicks' charge: "I realized later on that I was mistaken," D Col. Morris Davis said.

A US federal court has found the charge of providing material support for terrorism against David Hicks was applied retrospectively, writes Andy Park.


David Hicks’ conviction at Guantanamo Bay in 2007 has been ruled invalid by a US appeals court, paving the way for a full vindication of his innocence.

The Washington DC federal appeals court found that the charge of providing material support for terrorism against three men, including Osama bin Laden's former driver Salim Hamdan and Mr Hicks, could not be applied retrospectively.

The charge was created in 2006.

Mr Hicks was controversially detained on the charge at Guantanamo Bay from 2001 until 2007.

The chief prosecutor in the Guantanamo Bay military commissions in 2008, Col. Morris Davis (Ret.), told a US publication that the finding was “a body blow to credibility of the already beleaguered military commissions".

“I was one of the advocates for adding material support as a chargeable offense when Congress was crafting the Military Commissions Act in the summer of 2006. I personally approved the material support charges against Hamdan and Hicks in February of 2007. I realized later on that I was mistaken on both counts,” Col. Morris Davis said.

Mr Hicks’ former millitary lawyer Dan Mori told ABC24 it was vindicating “to have a US Federal court say you were right all along,”

Mr Mori said he expects the Australian government to respond given the complicity in the two government’s cooperation to convict Mr Hicks.

“The validity that these aren’t a valid offence and knowing that he was treated inappropriately, hopefully there will be some closer with the government,” he said.

Your Comments

Thank God there is still some kind of functioning judiciary in the US

David Fitzpatrick - from Healesville, Victoria, 7 months ago

It is gratifying to find that there are still judges in the US who are interested in justice, albeit grossly delayed justice. Perhaps the Supreme Court could consider closing the concentration camp at Guantanamo Bay and enjoining government employees to cease practicing torture. Until this happens it is difficult to believe the US is not teetering on the brink of totalitarianism.

Join the Discussion

Name
City / Suburb E.g. Artarmon, Sydney
Title
Comment
You have characters remaining.
Validation
What's this?
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
All submitted comments become the property of SBS. They are moderated, so we reserve the right to edit comments and remove HTML tags. Not all submitted comments will be published. Publication does not mean we endorse the opinions expressed. Please read our terms and conditions for more information.