Radio News Bulletin
- Latest Bulletin
Thu 20th Jun 2013 6:18AM - Featured Stories
Wed 30th Nov -0001 12:00AM - High Court okays Aboriginal alcohol controls
Wed 19th Jun 2013 12:00AM - UN defers decision on 'in danger' listing for Reef
Wed 19th Jun 2013 12:00AM - Agreement - of sorts - on Syria
Wed 19th Jun 2013 12:00AM
Promote Advertisement
Why do asylum boats keep coming from Sri Lanka?
Figures from the Department of Immigration have revealed a sharp increase this year in the number of boat arrivals from Sri Lanka.
The SBS MP3 Player requires the Adobe Flash 8 Plugin. You can get Flash from here...
So far this year, the number of boat arrivals from Sri Lanka is over six-thousand - almost 30 times bigger than last year's figure.
It's raised questions about the reasons for the recent jump.
LISTEN: Naomi Selvaratnam reports.
It's been more than three-and-a-half years since the end of the civil war in Sri Lanka between government forces and Tamil separatist rebels.
Yet 2012 has seen an unprecedented rise in the number of Sri Lankans arriving in Australia by boat to seek asylum.
Figures from the Department of Immigration show well over six-thousand Sri Lankans have arrived by boat so far this year - with Sri Lankans comprising by far the biggest source country of asylum seekers.
By comparison, there have been close to four-thousand (3850) Afghans, about two-and-a-half thousand (2499) Iranians and just over one thousand (1099) Pakistanis.
Senior Research Fellow for the Human Protection Hub at Griffith University, Sara Davies says it is common for the number of asylum seekers from a country to rise several years after a conflict ends.
"It's not uncommon in a post-conflict situation, particularly in a situation like Sri Lanka where it was a civil war, and where the conflict was in a particular location where there was an ethnic group that was under sustained combat with the government, to then in that post-conflict situation, to no longer feel safe, and to feel that they need to flee and escape.
"And it should be remembered too that there were hundreds of thousands of people forcibly displaced and sent to internment camps, and we still don't have precise numbers about how many were sent to these internment camps. And it is not impossible that these groups are slowly making their way down to coastal lines, to seek a passage, and it takes a lot of time."
Sara Davies says the number of people claiming asylum from Sri Lanka could be influenced by past Australian government policies - or stories told about them.
"There is no doubt that one of the things that might be informing the dramatic increase is the fact that a number of Sri Lankans were (previously) recognised as refugees.
"They've had their asylum seeking claims heard and processed, and people smugglers are reporting these positive news stories, if you like, back to the community, and they're saying that you have the chance to seek and gain passage.
"This is not uncommon. I mean, this has happened from World War One, World War Two, when populations are fleeing and they find out that there's a possibility of being received in a neighbouring country, no matter the distance, this is what they will do.
They will try to get to the country that provides them asylum."
One Australian Tamil community group says it believes the dramatic increase in the number of people seeking asylum is because some parts of the population in Sri Lanka still feel unsafe.
Bala Vigneswaran is a spokesman for the Australian Tamil Congress.
"The war means sometimes it's physical - the bombs are falling, the shells are flying and all sorts of things and the blood and death. Yes, that particular physical war is over. But all the factors that caused the war continue."
"People disappear, the militarisation of the northern east of Sri Lanka continues, and people are still in trouble. They're not getting the dividend of peace. People were very hopeful things would be better, but it doesn't seem to happen. So people are kind of disappointed, they are really leaving to save their lives."
Basil Fernando from the Hong Kong-based Asian Human Rights Commission, says the end of the civil war in Sri Lanka does not mean that human rights are now being respected.
In fact, he says the situation has worsened.
"The situation in Sri Lanka in many ways, is a very oppressive situation. In the past, the main problem was regarding the civil war. Now that situation doesn't exist after 2009. But over the country, the respect for civil rights have degenerated quite a lot."
The Sri Lankan government argues that there's no reason for any of its nationals to now be seeking asylum in other countries.
Government leaders say if there was anyone in genuine fear of persecution, they could take a far shorter and safer trip, for example, to neighbouring India.
But Basil Fernando from the Asian Human Rights Commission says many Sri Lankans have good reasons not to choose not to seek asylum in nearby countries, such as India.
"(The) Indian government doesn't provide any kind of support for their existence. So other places of course and even worse. So none of the Asian countries have a strong policy or protection for refugees. That is one of the reasons people go for other places. The system of refugee protection, the respect for the UN convention on Refugees is very much less in many ways and actually it doesn't exist."
The Gillard government has sought to dissuade asylum seekers from Sri Lanka by stepping up co-operation with the government in Colombo.
But the Deputy Director of the Geneva Centre for Security Policy Khalid Koser says Australian policy changes may not necessarily have any effect on reducing the number of people seeking asylum by boat.
"Lots of asylum seekers don't trust governments, and this isn't just about the Australian government. If you're fleeing a country where you're being persecuted or you think you're at risk of being persecuted then I think you have a natural mistrust of governments."
So the idea that because the Australian government says something asylum seekers will believe it I think is the first question. The second this is that, and of course not all asylum seekers are fleeing persecution and some of them are clearly economic migrants."
"But if you are fleeing persecution, if you are fleeing conflict, then frankly there's not much Australia can do that would make my life worse than it may be in Afghanistan or Sri Lanka or other places I'm coming from. So even if asylum seekers know that there are tough policies, even if they know they may be detained, that's not going to be enough to stop them trying to get out of harms way and come to a place where they think they will be safer."
Your Comments
Aus a soft touch
The safety net = welfare/housing/medical care etc. etc. = economic refugees; no 3rd world country has any safety net provisions = read the Aus Fed Police report to the expert committee it's all there in black and white; and it is Aus taxpayers that will and do fit the bill. Stop the boats now. Don't let the bleeding heart rhetoric may you feel guilty; Aus has violated the human rights of indigenous ppl for 200+ years; lets get that right before the illegal arrivals;
Dateline 28th August 2012
A kick in the pants for "Go Back to Where You Came From" when they showed the Dateline documentary after (28th August, 2012) (you can see this on You Tube - Sri Lankas New Wave). The Sri Lankan people tell you, first hand, why they are coming to Australia...."The Australian government will give us 16000 rupees and accommodation and everything else...even if we don't get released, they'll give us 40000 rupees" - watch it for yourself and then try and tell me they're genuine refugees.
Easy Relief
The distance between Mannar in Sri Lanka and Rameshwaram in India is 96.5 ks through the Palk Strait. There used to be a ferry that ran until 1983. Rameshwaram is in Tamil Nadu which would seem a logical haven for so called Tamil asylum seekers as they know the language and culture. We all know the reasons why they choose Australia. This is an industry in human trafficking and has nothing to do with asylum. The Australian Government does not live in the real world.
asylum
this is ridiculous all i know is out 1oo people who migrate 99 are for economic reasons ,all the stories are made up ,more than 80% of population in these countries would like to migrate to some other beter place so why not offer immigration to all of them and stop pretending ,i agree all of us in these countries like sirlanka pakistan and afghanistan and now iran would like to have beter life and not protection from persecution.so people who cant come the so called legal way they will come oth
Yes for refugees But?
Well to do people rarely become refugees. During the war and after the war north and south no difference more than half the population like to go to a country has a better economic future. Tamils and Sinhalese are both in the same boat when it come to emigration. Good thing is for Tamils has a good excuse. Most of the refugees wants the opportunity work and make their lives better. Please give them that chance in spite of what ever their claim. Open your heart to them. You no need to open your pocket to them as they are hard working people.
Mr.
Asylum seekers know that life in Australia is much better than in Sri Lanka. That is the VERY reason. Their claims are utter rubbish , supported by Ex LTTE members the spokesmen for these unfortunate young people.Jaffna was and still run by Upper Cast Tamils and the L:ow Cast Tamils only get the crumbs. They are the ones who leave Sri Lanka for better countries and blame the Sinhalese and the Govt.
The reality
When i see most of the jabber here it's like australians are being the southern americans like arizona and mississipi... Robin Williams might not have been far from the truth about the auusie. Yeah the red necks. If you do a check on who claims the welfare you would find the natives claim it more than immigrants. It's a race game where the fear of being a minority causes fear and
sinhala terror and lack of employment opportunities
i don't know what these sinhala ignorant idiots are talking about. tamils are of course economic migrants as well as political refugees. they are economic migrants because there are no employment opportunities for them in the terror island.. they are political refugees because they want to escape sinhala terror. if there are any aussies here , are you ignorant of the fact about 50,000 to 100,000 sinhala economic migrants have settled in victoria and new south wales during the past 25 years .
Mr
this is the final result of failed political leadership of the nation.when you see he drama running with chief justice and his husband is the best example for this matter.chief justice was political appointments and corrupted,criminal husband was appointed to the chairman of the country largest saving bank while knowing the facts that he is doing lot illegal.war is over what any responsible leaders will do?night race or basic need for the people suffering?the country has come in to lawless.
VideoNEW
Podcasts
Blogs



Previous 10 |