• People celebrate after the announcement of the same-sex marriage postal survey result in front of the State Library of Victoria in Melbourne. (AAP)
The Australian people have voted in favour of legalising same-sex marriage in the government's voluntary postal survey, triggering Malcolm Turnbull's promise to change the Marriage Act.
By
15 Nov - 10:04 AM  UPDATED 15 Nov - 7:46 PM

Key points:

  • Yes wins: 61 per cent of Australians vote to legalise same-sex marriage
  • Malcolm Turnbull wants to make it legal by Christmas 
  • Dean Smith's bill to change the Marriage Act introduced in Senate
  • Coalition conservatives want stronger religious exemptions

The Senate will on Thursday debate the wording of a bill to change the Marriage Act, after Australians voted decisively in favour of allowing same-sex couples to marry in a landmark national survey. 

The Yes vote triumphed in the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey, accounting for 61.6 per cent of the vote, while 38.4 per cent of respondents voted No. 

A private member's bill, co-sponsored by both major parties, was introduced in the Senate late on Wednesday afternoon, kicking off a legislative process that could see same-sex marriage legalised by Christmas. 

The results of the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey were announced on Wednesday morning by the head of the Australian Bureau of Statistics David Kalisch, ending a divisive three-month campaign. 

Same-sex marriage bill introduced to Senate on day of historic Yes vote

RELATED READING
Marriage equality's next hurdle: The legal stoush over human rights explained
Australians have voted in favour of same-sex marriage, but changing the definition in the 1961 Marriage Act is only just the start.

Despite some early criticisms that the use of the postal system would make the survey inaccessible, an overwhelming 79.5 per cent of Australian voters did participate, in what the Chief Statistician called an "outstanding" turnout.

Women responded in greater numbers than men at 81.6 per cent and 77.3 per cent respectively. 

Young voters also turned out in strong numbers with 78 per cent of those aged 18-19 and 72 per cent of those aged 20-24 making it to a post office with their completed forms.

At the other end of the spectrum, 80 per cent of Australians older than 85 voted. 

Same-sex marriage will now almost certainly be legalised in Australia through a change to the Marriage Act. 

RELATED READING
Australian marriage law explained: What benefits do married couples have that de facto couples don't?
De facto couples still often have to go to great lengths to prove their relationship, unlike married couples. Here's what the law says.

Turnbull pledges to change the law by Christmas

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said he was committed to changing the law by Christmas.

"Now it is up to us here in the parliament of Australia to get on with it, to get on with the job the Australian people have tasked us to do and get this done this year before Christmas," Mr Turnbull said, speaking immediately following the ABS announcement.

"The Australian people have spoken in their millions and they have voted overwhelmingly yes for marriage equality. They voted yes for fairness, they voted yes for commitment, they voted yes for love," Mr Turnbull said.

Mr Turnbull has previously said he expected a private member's bill to "sail through parliament". 

While Senator Dean Smith's bill has already been introduced to the Senate, the law cannot be changed until the House of Representatives reconvenes for the last sitting fortnight of parliament, which begins on November 27. 

Labor leader Bill Shorten is also pushing for the law to be changed as soon as possible.

"Today we celebrate, tomorrow we legislate!" Mr Shorten told a gathered crowd. 

Same-sex marriage legislation: SBS Chief Political Correspondent Daniela Ritorto explains

Conservative Liberals push for stronger religious exemptions

Exactly how the Marriage Act will change remains an active debate within the Coalition. 

Conservative Liberals are pushing for stronger religious protections, to shield individuals and companies who did not want to participate in same-sex weddings. 

Two Liberal senators had released very different bills - the moderate-backed Dean Smith bill, which was introduced to the Senate on Wednesday, and the James Paterson bill favoured by conservatives.

But late on Wednesday evening, Senator Paterson dropped his plan to introduce a competing bill. He now plans to negotiate amendments to the Smith bill instead. 

While the Smith bill allows churches to refuse to marry same-sex couples, the Paterson bill would have allowed anyone with a religious or moral objection to refuse to participate in the process – including florists, bakers and musicians.

It would also protect anyone voicing or acting on a belief that marriage should only be between a man and a woman from discrimination and vilification laws.

Mr Turnbull has indicated his preference for the Smith bill, which has been co-sponsored by Labor and the Greens.

"The Smith Bill has the advantage of having been around for some months now. Everyone is familiar with it, it has a wide degree of support across the chambers," he said.

'There is nothing more Australian than equality': Turnbull on same-sex marriage postal survey

But Mr Turnbull did not rule out amendments to the wording.

"Of course there's the opportunity to move amendments it and improve it," he said. 

Senator Dean Smith himself said changes could be considered, but cautioned against the provisions in the conservatives' bill that would allow service providers to discriminate against same-sex couples who were planning their weddings. 

"If there are amendments, let's see them. But let's be very clear about this: Australians did not participate in a survey to have one discrimination plank removed, to have other planks of discrimination piled upon them," Senator Smith said. 

Attorney-General George Brandis said he would support an amendement that allowed civil celebrants - as well as religious celebrants - to refuse to marry same-sex couples. 

'Democracy hasn't gone our way'

Lyle Shelton, the head of the Australian Christian Lobby and spokesman for the No campaign, said the result was "decisive" and congratulated the opposing campaign on their victory.

"Democracy hasn't gone our way today but I thank God that we live in a free and open and democratic society and I trust those people who have been energised by this campaign will continue to participate in our democracy," he said.

He credited the victory to a long-running and vigorous Yes campaign.

"As everyone will know, they have been campaigning for at least a decade," Mr Shelton said. 

"This is a democracy. They have been relentless in this and they have seen the fruit of their relentlessness."

But he said the No campaign's efforts would now refocus "on the parliamentary process".

Mr Shelton described the religious protections in the now-abandoned Paterson bill as the "bare minimum".

Liberal MP Craig Kelly, who supported the No vote, said he would vote for same-sex marriage in the parliament because a 58 per cent majority in his electorate of Hughes voted yes. 

Fellow Liberal MP Kevin Andrews, who supported the No campaign, said bakers should be given the right to refuse to service same-sex weddings. He said a gay baker or a Jewish baker should be allowed to refuse to service an Islamic wedding too, and vice versa. "It has to be consistent," he said. 

Strong No vote in Western Sydney seats held by Labor

Around the country, 133 electorates voted Yes while 17 voted no.

But some of the strongest No results were in Labor seats, despite the party's official election promise to support same-sex marriage.

Ten of the No-voting seats were located in west and south-west Sydney.

Support for same-sex marriage was lowest in the Labor MP Jason Clare's seat of Blaxland, where just 26 per cent of voters wanted the law to change.

In adjacent Watson, also in Sydney's south-west, only 30 per cent voted Yes.

Watson's local MP is Labor's Tony Burke, who said he would still be supporting the Yes position in the parliament.

"I went to the last election with a commitment to vote yes. That doesn't change," Mr Burke said.

"My community knows that if they are treated with prejudice, vilified or marginalised in any way I will stand up for them regardless of polls. The same applies to this issue."

Timeline of same-sex rights in Australia

1961: Australia introduces its first Marriage Act, but it does not include a formal definition of marriage
1975: South Australia becomes the first state to decriminalise male homosexuality
1976-1997: Other states and territories decriminalise male homosexuality
2004: The Marriage Act is amended to add the definition that "marriage means the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others"
2009: De facto couples are given similar rights to those who are married
2013: Federal Labor government makes it unlawful to discriminate against LGBTIQ (lesbian, gay, bi, trans, intersex, queer) people
2015: Conservative coalition government commits to a national plebiscite proposal on same-sex marriage
November 2016: Upper house Senate rebuffs the government's plans for a national plebiscite on gay unions
August 2017: Senate knocks backs national plebiscite proposal again, government pushes ahead with a national voluntary postal vote
September 2017: Ballot papers for the postal vote are sent out
November 15, 2017: Some 61.6 percent of eligible Australians vote in favour of changing the law to allow same-sex couples to marry

- from AFP