The pro-coal MPs credit Sir Monash for turning the La Trobe Valley into an “electrical powerhouse” through his investment in coal-fired power as the Victorian electricity boss in the 1920s.
But Sir Monash’s seven relatives, including his living grandson John Colin Bennett, have asked the Monash Forum to “withdraw” its use of the family name.
“We dissociate ourselves specifically from the Forum’s use of the Monash name for their anti-science and anti-intellectual argument, to give that an air of authority. And we are asking that they withdraw the name,” Mark Durre, a signatory and Sir Monash’s great-grandson, told ABC Radio.
The family members said Sir Monash was “no left-wing radical in his personal politics” but he was “intellectual and scientific”.
“Back then, coal was cutting edge technology,” Mr Durre said.
The Monash Forum is calling for its Coalition leaders to intervene directly in the energy market by building a new government-funded coal-fired power station, described as a “Hazelwood 2.0”.
Treasurer Scott Morrison seemed to dismiss the idea, arguing new coal-fired power was more expensive that the cheap power from existing, aged stations.
“There is a difference between old coal and new coal,” he told the AFR Banking and Wealth Summit this week.
“It is false to think that a new coal-fired power station will generate electricity at the same price as old coal-fired power stations for the obvious reason that the asset has already been written off.”
The RSL has already criticised the Forum for using the Monash name, saying the decorated Army commander’s name ought to be “sacrosanct”.