• File Image: Chinese members of the Communist Party of China (AAP)Source: AAP
The insistence that party members refer to each other with an LGBT+ slang term is just a little bit great.
By
Ben Winsor

18 Nov 2016 - 10:57 AM  UPDATED 18 Nov 2016 - 10:57 AM

The ruling Chinese Communist Party has issued written guidelines to revive the practice of calling each other ‘comrade’ at party meetings.

The term – ‘tongzhi’ in Chinese – was commonly used among communists in the time of Mao and Lenin, the South China Morning Post reports.

But after falling out of favour among political operatives, ‘tongzhi’ was adopted by LGBT+ Chinese people to show solidarity between each other – eventually falling into more common usage to describe gay people.

Recommended:
Taiwan set to be first Asian country to legalise same-sex marriage
“When it comes to love, everyone is equal,” the president said.

In 2012 an authoritative Chinese dictionary found itself the target of criticism after it explicitly refused to acknowledge the term’s second meaning.

“We knew about the usage but we can't include it,” one of the authors told the BBC at the time.

“You can use the word whichever way you like, but we won't put it into a standard dictionary because we don't want to promote these things. We don't want to draw attention to these things,” he said.

The South China Morning Post reports that the Communist Party made the decision in order to promote equality, rather than have people addressed by their titles which enforces a hierarchy.

Recommended:
Violence against women is a universal problem
Comment: It’s easy to point to flaws in other societies when it comes to violence against women, but it’s a universal issue that would benefit from less judgement and greater co-operation, writes Amal Awad.
Ricky Martin is engaged and his fans are losing it
He's captured the heart of Syrian-Sweedish babe Jwan Yosef, and broken those of his many loyal fans.
Comment: Why do we really need to repeal 18C?
With renewed calls for the repeal or amendment of Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, are we paving the way for a more oppressive Australia?