Self-interest appears rife when it comes to the cost of travel. Ms Ley is only the latest politician to leave the distinct impression that the entitlement provided to support politicians in the effective performance of their duties also doubles as a lifestyle perk.
Ms Ley's problem is that what explanation has so far been provided under scrutiny in recent days has not been consistent. She first said the travel to the Gold Coast for herself and her partner had been ticked off as within the rules, but now says it was an error of judgment and she will repay the money.
No adequate justification has yet been provided for her travel to the Gold Coast over two consecutive years during the New Year's Eve period at taxpayer expense to meet a Queensland businesswoman and political donor.
The list of political careers ruined by expenses scandals over the years runs long, yet still the system has not been fixed. As with the issue of political donations, what disclosure is made about travel entitlements is often vague and slow.
The cost of travel for politicians and public servants must be reasonable and always to the public, rather than personal, benefit.
