Watch FIFA World Cup 2026™ LIVE, FREE and EXCLUSIVE

Youth in Revolt Review

Adaptation never gels as a wholly satisfying film.

By all accounts, Miguel Arteta’s adaptation of the CD Payne’s 'Journals of Nick Twisp’ series of books pleased the fans, most of whom apparently felt the fiercely idiosyncratic works were too rich in character and eccentricity to work as a Hollywood film.

Arteta captured the stifling sense of stillness that small-town America inflicts on its misplaced dreamers in 2002’s The Good Girl (still Jennifer Aniston’s best movie), so he seemed a good choice to tell the story of a young virgin who invents a soulless, mischievous alter-ego named Francois Dillinger to help him escape the drudgery of his everyday life. As Nick/Francois, the casting of Michael Cera was also inspired – he championed for the part, having been a Twisp/Payne devotee for many years.

So the fans of Payne’s books are happy, and they have every right to be. Arteta does have a terrific handle on the literate world of Twisp, his dream girl Sheeni (Portia Doubleday) and the sad, sick, well-cast adults that unknowingly combine to make his life miserable (Ray Liotta, Zach Galifianikis, Jean Smart, Fred Willard, Steve Buscemi, Mary Kay Place and Justin Long).

But Arteta’s faithfulness to Payne’s text, themes and visions never gel as a wholly satisfying film. The film sags when Cera is not interacting with his Francois-inspired dark side, so ineffectual is he in the part of Nick (a character who, as the opening shot of the film suggests, is actually a bit of a wanker); a terrific scene in a French-themed boarding school is countered by a terrible scene involving magic-mushrooms and Sheeni’s parents; stabs at (relatively) mainstream comedy (a dumb suicide attempt or the over-staged destruction of Nick’s hometown by his own hand) are handled awkwardly.

Youth in Revolt bypassed Australian cinemas, which raised the shackles of many local supporters of Payne’s books. But its exhibition shut-out is not too hard to fathom – the imbalance between the weird and the wonderful, the end result floating somewhere between Hunter S. Thompson, Catcher in the Rye and Napoleon Dynamite, would have been a really tough sell to local audiences. It will no doubt secure its own cult following for that very reason, but its smugness, posey teen-angst grumblings and cast of caricatures make it a damn-near impossible film to like.


3 min read

Published

By Simon Foster

Source: SBS


Share this with family and friends


Follow SBS

Download our apps

Listen to our podcasts

Get the latest with our SBS podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch SBS On Demand

Over 11,000 hours

News, drama, documentaries, SBS Originals and more - for free.

Watch now