SKIP TO MAIN CONTENT

Balogh awaits Games fate

Olympic gold medallist Suzy Balogh could know her Commonwealth Games fate by weeks end after a panel was established to hear about her shock omission from the team.

Suzy_Balogh_shooting_B_AAP_100719_715111048

2 min read

Published

Updated

Source: AAP


Skip to article content

Olympic gold medallist Suzy Balogh could know her Commonwealth Games fate by the end of the week after a panel was established to hear her appeal.

Balogh is contesting her omission from the Australian shooting team nominated for the Delhi Games in October after teenager Laetisha Scanlan was controversially chosen for the women's trap event ahead of her.

Australian Shooting International (ASI) on Monday named a three-man panel chaired by Steven McEwen QC and including David Tillett and Peter Quire to hear 2004 Olympic champion Balogh's appeal.

News that makes sense

Your trusted source for staying up-to-date with the world around you. Get free daily news updates and analysis, straight to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

"The panel will commence work immediately on the appeal and a decision could come as early as the end of this week," said ASI chief executive Nick Sullivan.

The national selectors opted for 17-year-old Scanlan ahead of the seasoned Balogh as the second women's trap shooter behind top qualifier Stacey Roiall who claimed automatic selection.

Balogh finished a narrow one point ahead of Scanlan in qualifying and Sullivan said that left the decision in the hands of the selectors.

Balogh, 37, is looking to add to her three Commonwealth medals – a gold and two bronze - won at two previous Games appearances.

And she believed her qualifying result should be decisive.

“I'm appealing because I finished second and I believe that I am the best medal chance for Australia at the Commonwealth Games,"

Balogh told AAP when omitted earlier this month.

"It is a quantitative sport, why select it on a qualitative basis?"

Sullivan said ASI had been prepared for an appeal.

"Given that the selection criteria for the second team place allowed for some discretion by the selectors, there was bound to be an appeal and so this is not unexpected," he said.

"In fact the appeals process provides an opportunity to ensure the selectors followed the guidelines set down, ensuring the process is fair and transparent.

"The panel contains extensive experience, and will assess all possible evidence and information before announcing their decision."


Get SBS News straight to your inbox

Sign up now for daily news from Australia and around the world. You can also subscribe to Insight's weekly newsletter for in-depth features and first-person stories.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Follow SBS News

Download our apps

Listen to our podcasts

Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service

Stream now

Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world