Legal aid law may change after Bayley win

The Victorian government says it will consider whether it needs to change the Legal Aid Act after a judge made a ruling in favour of a notorious killer.

Adrian Bayley

Source: AAP

Notorious rapist and killer Adrian Ernest Bayley has had a legal victory that brings him one step closer to being eligible for parole in his 70s instead of his 80s.

But the Victorian government will consider changing legal aid laws after a court granted Bayley a second chance to apply for taxpayer-funded lawyers in his appeal against two rape convictions.

He had launched legal action against a Victorian Legal Aid independent reviewer after his initial bid for legal aid was blocked.

Already serving life for the 2012 rape and murder of Melbourne woman Jill Meagher, Bayley wanted to appeal against additional rape convictions handed down earlier this year.

If successful, an appeal would have reduced his current non-parole period of 43 years to something closer to the 35 years imposed when he was jailed for Ms Meagher's murder.

The state government in September formally intervened to prevent Bayley, 44, accessing funding for an appeal.

On Friday, Victorian Supreme Court judge Kevin Bell ruled in Bayley's favour and ordered VLA to refer the decision to a different independent reviewer.

Attorney-General Martin Pakula said the government was disappointed in the outcome and would read the decision to see whether any amendment to the Legal Aid Act was necessary.

"We'll examine the judgment, we'll examine the reasons given by the court and we'll assess whether any amendment is necessary," Mr Pakula told reporters on Friday.

In his judgment, Justice Bell said legal assistance cannot be denied because an applicant is notorious, unpopular and has prior convictions.

"All persons are equal before the law and the Legal Aid Act requires consideration of applications to be objective, criterion based and non-arbitrary," Justice Bell said.

During the hearing, Saul Holt SC, acting pro-bono for Bayley, told the Victorian Supreme Court that denying Bayley legal aid is a breach of the charter of human rights.

Weaknesses in the prosecution case against Bayley left open the likelihood that someone else committed the offences, Mr Holt said.

Shadow attorney-general John Pesuttos said Victorians had every reason to be deeply disappointed that Bayley can now continue with the appeals process.


Share
2 min read

Published

Updated

Source: AAP


Share this with family and friends


Get SBS News daily and direct to your Inbox

Sign up now for the latest news from Australia and around the world direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Download our apps
SBS News
SBS Audio
SBS On Demand

Listen to our podcasts
An overview of the day's top stories from SBS News
Interviews and feature reports from SBS News
Your daily ten minute finance and business news wrap with SBS Finance Editor Ricardo Gonçalves.
A daily five minute news wrap for English learners and people with disability
Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS
SBS World News

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service
Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world