Australian Medical Association president Andrew Pesce - who wanted Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott to focus more on policy and less on politics - believes both delivered.
Mr Rudd promised alternative funding for rural and regional hospitals, while Mr Abbott pledged to provide an additional 3,500 beds.
News that makes sense
Your trusted source for staying up-to-date with the world around you. Get free daily news updates and analysis, straight to your inbox.
YOUR SAY: Who won the healthcare debate?
"From the prime minister's point of view, I believe he did announce there would be alternative funding for country hospitals which were too small to rely on case-mix funding," Dr Pesce said, after the nationally-televised debate.
"That gives us much more reassurance that there'll be appropriate funding so those small rural hospitals can continue to deliver the services their communities require."
Case-mix funding, also known as activity-based funding, will see hospitals paid for each service they deliver rather than via block grants.
'More hospital beds'
Federal Labor wants to roll out activity-based funding across the country. But smaller hospitals argue they will be disadvantaged under the plan because they do not deliver as many services as metropolitan hospitals.
Dr Pesce also welcomed Mr Abbott's vow to provide more hospital beds.
LISTEN to Dr Pesce's verdict on the healthcare debate by clicking below "Mr Abbott, I believe, has committed to funding 3,500 extra hospital beds," the AMA president said. "That's a good thing and something the AMA has been calling for for some time." However, Dr Pesce said there was still not enough detail from either side to determine whose vision for the future of healthcare was better. 'Not enough detail' "The government has announced more but it's had a head start," he said. "I encourage the opposition to develop their policy and put it out for scrutiny as well." During the debate, Mr Rudd said Labor's activity-based funding would take into account all the local costs in rural areas "to make sure it works". "But if that doesn't, then of course we'd look at a form of national block funding which was able to underpin the continuation of smaller rural hospitals in the future," he said. Mr Abbott said the coalition was considering "effective ways" to give public hospitals the extra 3500 beds that experts say they need to clear emergency departments and to shrink waiting lists.
