Veterans who participated in Cold War nuclear weapons tests cannot sue Britain's Defence Ministry after a court ruled on Monday that they didn't have enough evidence to prove their illnesses resulted from exposure to radiation.
Ten former servicemen sought damages from the ministry, arguing that a low but significant dose of radiation during nuclear testing in Australia and on Pacific Ocean islands in the 1950s resulted in illnesses including cancer, skin defects and arthritis.
But the Court of Appeal said nine out of the 10 test cases cannot continue in court because the veterans launched the cases after the legal time limit expired and because the men could not prove that radiation - rather than the onset of old age - prompted their illnesses.
"We have no doubt that it will appear that the law is hard on people like these claimants who have given service to their country and may have suffered harm as a result," Judge Janet Smith said in the judgment. She noted, however, that veterans exposed to radiation that might have caused them injury are entitled to a war pension.
The 10th case, that of Bert Sinfield, was entitled to proceed to trial. Sinfield, who died in 2007, claimed damages for anaemia and lymphoma. The 10 were test cases among a group of 1011 veterans - most from Britain, though some are from Fiji and New Zealand.
News that makes sense
Your trusted source for staying up-to-date with the world around you. Get free daily news updates and analysis, straight to your inbox.
Neil Sampson, a lawyer representing the veterans, said lawyers are considering taking the nine rejected cases to the Supreme Court.
He added that because the 1011 cases were all different, there was nothing to stop the others from suing.
Defence officials argued that the ministry took all precautions to protect servicemen from radiation exposure. It also said that in most cases, the men were exposed to no more than the background radiation they would have experienced in the UK.
