The families of people murdered by parolees are about to learn whether the Victorian government has heeded their calls for sweeping changes to the state's parole system.
Previously announced changes, including making breaching parole a crime, will be debated in parliament this week, while a review of the state's parole system by retired High Court judge Ian Callinan may also be released as early as Tuesday.
Premier Denis Napthine said the state would have the toughest parole regime in the country.
"We'll be debating further toughening of parole laws in Victoria to make it very clear that we will have the toughest parole conditions in Australia," Dr Napthine told reporters on Monday.
"There is no doubt that there needs to be improvements to our parole processes.
"We make no apology for making it very clear that parole is a privilege not a right."
Among the measures being debated in parliament are making breaching parole an offence and giving police greater powers to deal with those those who breach parole.
The government has already made it mandatory to put violent offenders back in jail if they are convicted of a serious crime while on parole.
The crackdown follows about 13 murders by parolees in recent years, including the Jill Meagher case, with the families of victims among those calling for greater transparency and accountability by the parole board.
Dr Napthine met with Ms Meagher's widower Tom last week to discuss his concerns about the Adult Parole Board of Victoria.
Helen Wicking, whose daughter Joanne was killed by a parolee in 2010, says victims of crime need to have a stronger voice in parole decisions, and called for stronger surveillance once prisoners are released.
Steve Medcraft, president of People Against Lenient Sentencing, says he hopes to see a degree of transparency introduced to the parole board.
"I would hope that we get a clearer insight into the workings of the body and more involvement from people affected by the decisions," he said.
The board's decisions are made in an administrative rather than a legal setting, meaning prisoners are not entitled to legal representation and hearings are not open to the public or media.
Two of the four reviews of the state's parole system - suppressed during an inquest - examine 11 cases of offenders alleged to have murdered people while on parole.
The issue goes back before State Coroner Judge Ian Gray on Tuesday. He last week lifted the suppression order but the Department of Justice sought a stay while it considered an appeal.
Opposition Leader Daniel Andrews said the Callinan and other reviews should be made public.
"There needs to be an open process. It needs to be transparent."
