The US Supreme Court has removed the overall limit on contributions a donor can make to political candidates, a move that could open the floodgates to campaign funding by rich individuals.
The move on Wednesday was immediately hailed by Republicans, who are gearing up to challenge President Barack Obama's Democratic supporters for control of the Senate in October polls.
The top court, in a five to four ruling read by Chief Justice John Roberts, did retain limits on the amount an individual donor can give to a single candidate, but removed an overall cap.
The Obama administration's argument that aggregate limits help fight corruption by preventing wealthy donors from circumventing the cap on individual contributions by funding rafts of candidates.
But the Supreme Court bench ruled that the overall ceiling did little to address graft and bribery "while seriously restricting participation in the democratic process".
News that makes sense
Your trusted source for staying up-to-date with the world around you. Get free daily news updates and analysis, straight to your inbox.
"The aggregate limits are therefore invalid under the First Amendment," the court's ruling said.
The decision strips away current rules that limit an individual's overall campaign donations to no more than $US123,200 ($A133,600) over two years.
And the ruling comes three years after the court lifted a ceiling on campaign giving by corporations and unions, in the controversial Citizens United V the Federal Election Commission.
"If the Court in Citizens United opened a door, today's decision may well open a floodgate," warned liberal justice Stephen Breyer's in a dissenting opinion released along with the judgment.
But Republicans hailed the decision as a victory for free speech.
"Freedom of speech is being upheld," declared House Speaker John Boehner, adding that donors should have the right "to give what they want to give".
