SKIP TO MAIN CONTENT

Why mushroom killer Erin Patterson is returning to court this week

The 51-year-old is serving a life sentence after she was found guilty of fatally poisoning three relatives at a family lunch.

A middle-aged white woman wearing a brown cardigan is escorted off a a prison truck by blue-uniformed officers and into a courthouse.
Erin Patterson (centre) is appealing her murder convictions for deliberately poisoning three relatives. Source: AAP / Jason Edwards

3 min read

Published

By Miles Proust

Source: SBS News


Skip to article content

In brief

  • Erin Patterson will face the Victorian Court of Appeal this week, as she tries to quash her murder convictions.
  • She was found guilty of deliberately poisoning four relatives at a lunch at her Gippsland home in July 2023.

Erin Patterson, dubbed 'the mushroom killer' after a sensational case, will return to court this week in a bid to overturn her murder convictions for deliberately poisoning three relatives.

Patterson, 51, was last year jailed for life with a non-parole period of 33 years after she was found guilty of murdering her estranged husband's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, 66.

She killed them by lacing beef Wellington with lethal death cap mushrooms at a family lunch at her Leongatha home in Gippsland, Victoria, in July 2023.

Patterson was also found guilty of attempting to murder Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, who became gravely ill but survived.

Patterson argued the deaths were a tragic accident, claiming the poisonous fungi were unintentionally included in the meal, and she later covered up her actions in a panic.

News that makes sense

Your trusted source for staying up-to-date with the world around you. Get free daily news updates and analysis, straight to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

The case garnered unprecedented public and media attention and was the subject of several books, television shows and podcasts.

Why is Erin Patterson returning to court?

Patterson will face a two-day hearing that starts on Wednesday at Victoria's Court of Appeal in Melbourne's CBD.

The hearing is an application for leave to appeal, which is a formal request to the court to hear the appeal.

A composite image of a woman in a red jumper next to a man and a woman in coats.
Heather Wilkinson (left) and Don and Gail Patterson (right) died in hospital after eating a meal laced with deadly death cap mushrooms. Source: AAP / Supplied

The prosecution and defence will submit written and oral arguments, before a full panel of three judges will determine whether the case has merit for an appeal.

If Patterson is successful, the court could quash her convictions and order a retrial, or acquit her.

If the court rules against her, her convictions will stand, and she will serve out the remainder of her sentence.

In that instance, she could appeal to the High Court, which is Australia's highest court and can overturn decisions made in lower courts.

The Director of Public Prosecutions is also appealing the length of the sentence, arguing Patterson — who will be 82 years old when she is eligible for parole in 2056 — should be locked up for life.

If they are successful, Patterson could be re-sentenced to life without parole or a non-parole period of greater than 33 years.

Patterson is not expected to attend the hearing in person, instead appearing via video link from prison.

What is Patterson appealing?

In documents lodged with the court last year, Patterson, who has always maintained her innocence, argued she suffered a "miscarriage of justice" during the 10-week trial, laying out seven grounds of appeal.

She claimed the prosecution's five-day cross-examination of her was "unfair and oppressive", while the prosecution's closing address "caused a substantial miscarriage of justice".

The prosecution "changed its case" by implying there was a motive for murder in the closing address, despite saying there was no motive for the killings in their opening statement, the documents state.

Patterson also criticised key prosecution evidence, including cell tower evidence and sightings of death cap mushrooms in Loch and Outtrim in Victoria, which was used at trial.

The final ground of appeal argued there was a "fundamental irregularity" when the jury was sequestered for deliberations.

The Victorian Supreme Court previously confirmed the 12-person jury was unwittingly staying at the same hotel as the lead detective and two members of the prosecution.


For the latest from SBS News, download our app and subscribe to our newsletter.


Get SBS News straight to your inbox

Sign up now for daily news from Australia and around the world. You can also subscribe to Insight's weekly newsletter for in-depth features and first-person stories.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Follow SBS News

Download our apps

Listen to our podcasts

Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service

Stream now

Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world