The Greens have said they could once again strike at the Government's proposed law that will make Australian citizenship tougher for migrants, to have it removed from the Senate notice paper.
ven as the citizenship legislation is listed for introduction and passage through parliament in the Spring sittings, Immigration Minister says the Government is still consulting about the key components of the legislation.
After the Australian Citizenship Legislation Amendment (Strengthening the Requirements for Australian Citizenship and Other Measures) Bill was removed from Senate notice paper last year, the Government failed to bring it in parliament before 1 July 2018 by when the Government intended to implement it.
The Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet later included it in the list of Bills intended to be introduced for passage in the Spring session of Parliament that began in August.
Immigration Minister David Coleman told SBS Punjabi that the Government has been “involved in consultations”. He did not give any timeframe on when the Bill may be brought in Parliament.
“In terms of the timing of the legislation is not something that the Government comments on the specificity,” Mr Coleman told SBS Punjabi.
Greens Immigration Spokesperson, Senator Nick McKim says the Government doesn’t have the numbers to have the Bill passed through the Senate.
“If the Government thought they had the numbers in the Senate to pass this Bill, they would have moved for debate and passed it already,” Senator McKim told SBS Punjabi.
The Government brought the first draft Bill that sought to make migrants wait for four years as permanent residents before applying for Australian citizenship, besides requiring them to prove competent English proficiency.
With increased general residence requirement for permanent resident up from one year and a stand-alone English test for migrants proving to be the key sticking points, a united opposition forced the Bill off the Senate notice board in October last year after it was passed by the lower house.
The Government has since softened its position on some elements of the law, including the English test which now could be a “primary school-level conversational test” - something that the previous Citizenship Minister Alan Tudge referred to in June.
Mr Coleman says it makes “a lot of sense” for people to learn English.
“I think it’s common sense to say that some level of English is a positive thing and the more English people are able to speak, the more they are able to speak, the more they are able to participate in the Australian life,” he said.
Both the Greens and Labor remain firm on its opposition to a stand-alone English language test.
“We don’t think it’s appropriate to be testing for English because there are a number of people who History has shown have made fantastic contributions who would have failed a primary level English test,” Senator McKim said.
The party is also opposed to making migrants wait longer to be able to apply for citizenship and the legislation seeking to give the minister powers to overturn decisions of the AAT in matters of Australian citizenship.
Shadow Citizenship Minister Tony Bourke has also made his party’s opposition to the citizenship changes known. In the face of a united opposition, the Government will need nearly all the crossbench senators in order to pass the changes through the Senate.
“I think, the fact that they haven’t done that is effectively an admission by the Government that they don’t have the numbers,” Senator McKim told SBS Punjabi.
He says if the Government delays a debate on it, his party would once again move to have it removed from the Senate notice paper.
“The Greens aren’t prepared to just sit by and just allow this legislation to remain on notice paper if the Government isn’t going to bring it on. We will certainly consider once again to have this legislation struck off the notice paper if we think the government is using it for political posturing.”
