Australia's highest-ranking legal officers give evidence in Canberra

SBS World News Radio: Australia's two highest-ranking legal officers have given evidence before a Senate committee in Canberra.

Australia's highest-ranking legal officers give evidence in CanberraAustralia's highest-ranking legal officers give evidence in Canberra

Australia's highest-ranking legal officers give evidence in Canberra

The discussion was at times heated, as solicitor general Justin Gleeson and attorney-general George Brandis sparred with senators over their recent public feud.

The dispute between Attorney General George Brandis and Australia's second-highest ranking lawyer, solicitor General Justin Gleeson has become highly politicised.

And today there were some fiery exchanges between the Senators at a Committee hearing in Canberra.

Nationals senator Barry O'Sullivan at one point accused the panel's chair, Louise Pratt, of a cover-up.

The dispute is centred around a ruling by Senator Brandis that requires the Solicitor General to get his permission before giving legal advice to other members of parliament.

The Solicitor General, Justin Gleeson, says he wants that ruling overturned.

"The change is one which is making the function of my office exceptionally difficult."

The committee is looking into the new guidelines, which mean that no one - not even the Prime Minister - could seek legal advice from the Solicitor General without first getting the Attorney-General's approval.

Mr Gleeson says the implications are serious.

"Do I lie awake at night and think, reading this direction literally, the attorney general could seek an injunction against me to restrain me performing my office? I do."

But Senator Brandis says there's no cause for concern.

"I obviously do not agree with that. I regard this as merely an administrative arrangement."

There was further disagreement over whether Mr Gleeson knew Senator Brandis was planning to make the change.

Mr Gleeson says the ruling came as a surprise.

But Senator Brandis insists he did consult with his fellow law officer in a meeting last year.

He told the senators, the dispute comes down to semantics around the word "consult."

At one point he referred to the dictionary.

"I've taken the trouble of providing you with a photocopy of the, all the senses that are the dictionary understands of the word consult. This is not a word, this is not a word, that has one meaning in law and another meaning in common speech."

It's on this issue that Labor says Senator Brandis has acted inappropriately.

Senator Brandis told parliament he had consulted Mr Gleeson over the change.

Shadow attorney-general Mark Dreyfus says that amounts to misleading the parliament.

"I say again, Senator Brandis has misled the Australian parliament and on his own words it is a serious offence and the penalty for this offence is for him to resign.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says there's no need for that.

"I'm sure that whatever differences or misunderstandings will be resolved."

 

 


Share

3 min read

Published

Updated

By James Elton-Pym



Share this with family and friends


Get SBS News daily and direct to your Inbox

Sign up now for the latest news from Australia and around the world direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Download our apps
SBS News
SBS Audio
SBS On Demand

Listen to our podcasts
An overview of the day's top stories from SBS News
Interviews and feature reports from SBS News
Your daily ten minute finance and business news wrap with SBS Finance Editor Ricardo Gonçalves.
A daily five minute news wrap for English learners and people with disability
Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS
SBS World News

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service
Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world