SKIP TO MAIN CONTENT

Cheaper NDIS name change: minister

The national disability insurance scheme's second name change within a year only cost taxpayers $68,000 despite much higher estimates.

Julia Gillard pose for photos with children with a disability
The national disability insurance scheme's second name change in a year only cost taxpayers $86,000. (AAP)

2 min read

Published

Updated

Source: AAP


Skip to article content

The federal government has given the national disability insurance scheme back its original name for a fraction of the initial $2.8 million estimate.

The previous Labor government rebranded it DisabilityCare Australia after spending almost $200,000 on focus group testing, $130,000 for a logo and brand strategy and $17.96 million advertising the new name.

Late last year Assistant Social Services Minister Mitch Fifield decided to reinstate the original name after concerns that DisabilityCare was seen as condescending by people with disabilities.

Ministerial briefing documents to Senator Fifield, obtained by AAP under Freedom of Information, show an initial cost estimate of $2.8 million.

But Senator Fifield told AAP he had refused that quote and the department achieved the name change for much less - $68,137.

News that makes sense

Your trusted source for staying up-to-date with the world around you. Get free daily news updates and analysis, straight to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

There were costs incurred to change communications materials, the website, links, email addresses but the bulk of the money went to updating office signage.

"It was important to the government that the name is embraced by the people the scheme is designed to support," he said.

"Australians with disability do not want to be objects of care."

Senator Fifield, in opposition, made calls for the public release of the assessment tools which are used to gauge a person's level of need.

But the NDIS agency fears releasing the criteria could result in fraudulent conduct.

"Participants could be coached to prepare their responses to questions that could compromise the integrity of the assessment process," a ministerial briefing document says.

Disclosure might have allowed participants to provide misleading responses as a way of obtaining "unjustifiable support".

This could affect the scheme's financial sustainability in the medium term.

In January, the effectiveness of the assessment tools was reviewed.


Get SBS News straight to your inbox

Sign up now for daily news from Australia and around the world. You can also subscribe to Insight's weekly newsletter for in-depth features and first-person stories.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Follow SBS News

Download our apps

Listen to our podcasts

Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service

Stream now

Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world