Bill Shorten's "winning smile" can't be the reason why a building company gave money to the union he once led, the federal government says.
The Labor leader has come under pressure to explain his role as a trade union boss amid claims the Victorian branch of the Australian Workers Union in 2005 invoiced Winslow Constructors for $38,228.68 to pay for 105 union memberships.
"I'm sure (Winslow) didn't give them the money because they liked his winning smile," acting Employment Minister Christopher Pyne told the Nine Network on Friday, adding the public deserved to know why the money was given to the union.
Labor frontbencher Anthony Albanese defended Mr Shorten, arguing he was committed to advancing workers' living standards and was willing to co-operate with any inquiries at the royal commission into trade unions.
The inquiry should be able to run its course separate from political commentary, he said.
"This is a legal process, it should be separate from political processes," Mr Albanese told the Nine Network.
Another Labor frontbencher, Richard Marles, said Mr Shorten's track record would prove his union reputation and credentials.
"If this is going to be a trial of Bill Shorten's achievements, we welcome that," he told ABC radio.
Share
