High Court bid to allow deaf jurors fails

Deaf Australia fears a High Court ruling against a woman who wanted to become the country's first deaf juror could have wider implications for her community.

HC

File image of the High Court. Source: AAP

A Queensland woman who wanted to become the country's first deaf juror says a High Court ruling against her is "a smack in the face" for deaf Australians.

Gaye Lyons, who is profoundly deaf, on said her case was about the principle of justice and equality for "every citizen of Australia".

"Deaf people should not be treated any differently," Ms Lyons said.

"The High Court does not see that."

The deputy registrar of an Ipswich court told Ms Lyons in 2012 she must be excused from jury duty because there was no provision in the state's Jury Act to swear in an Auslan interpreter, or for that person to be allowed in the jury room.

Ms Lyons took the case to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal, the Supreme Court of Queensland and the Queensland Court of Appeal, where the decision was upheld each time.

The High Court on Wednesday dismissed her appeal.

Chief Executive of Deaf Australia Kyle Miers said the court had failed to recognise the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

"'It is time for all states and territories, including the Commonwealth government, to take immediate action to amend their Anti-Discrimination Acts and to remove discrimination in all areas, and more importantly, recognising the right for deaf people to use Auslan," he said.

Their honours agreed that Queensland law did not permit an interpreter to be present during jury deliberations in the absence of specific legislative provisions.

In arguing Ms Lyons' case, solicitor Kylie Nomchong SC rejected claims about possible errors from interpreters and said there was just as much chance that a hearing juror would be bored, distracted or suffer a lapse in concentration.

Lawyers for the state said there was no way to test the accuracy of interpretations and the Jury Act was simply being administered as it was intended.

The High Court ruled that the presence of a person other than a juror in the jury room during deliberations was "an incurable irregularity", regardless of whether or not they participated.

Queensland Attorney-General Yvette D'Ath said the confidentiality of jury deliberations and the right to a fair trial were "among the most fundamental tenets of our justice system."


Share

3 min read

Published

Updated

Source: AAP



Share this with family and friends


Get SBS News daily and direct to your Inbox

Sign up now for the latest news from Australia and around the world direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Download our apps
SBS News
SBS Audio
SBS On Demand

Listen to our podcasts
An overview of the day's top stories from SBS News
Interviews and feature reports from SBS News
Your daily ten minute finance and business news wrap with SBS Finance Editor Ricardo Gonçalves.
A daily five minute news wrap for English learners and people with disability
Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS
SBS World News

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service
Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world