High Court examines Zachary Rolfe's 'good faith' ahead of Kumanjayi Walker murder trial

Australia's highest court on Tuesday began considering a challenge to a key pillar of NT police Constable Zachary Rolfe's defence for the alleged murder of Kumanjayi Walker.

Zachary Rolfe arrives at the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory in Darwin, Monday, August 23, 2021

Zachary Rolfe arrives at the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory in Darwin, Monday, August 23, 2021 Source: AAP

This article contains references to a deceased Aboriginal person.

Whether a police officer can argue he acted in "good faith" in the alleged murder of an Indigenous man is subject of a legal showdown in Australia's highest court.

Prosecutors are challenging a key tenet of Constable Zachary Rolfe's defence in his pending trial for the alleged murder of Northern Territory man Kumanjayi Walker.

The 19-year-old was shot three times after stabbing Mr Rolfe with a pair of surgical scissors while being arrested in the remote community of Yuendumu in November 2019.

The full bench of the High Court is determining whether Mr Rolfe can rely on an immunity clause contained in the territory's Police Administration Act.

It provides a protection from prosecution for actions performed in "good faith" during the exercise of police power.

Prosecutor Philip Strickland SC argued on Tuesday a liberal construction of the clause risks leaving citizens vulnerable to police abuse or excess.

"It would mean that any activity of a police officer would not be tethered to any notion of reasonableness," he told the court.

"The significance of an incorrect ruling is that the respondent may be acquitted of murder ... on an incorrect basis."

The court was told a good faith defence relied on Mr Rolfe having an honest belief he was using reasonable force to arrest Mr Walker.

As well as murder, Mr Rolfe faces alternative charges of manslaughter and engaging in a violent act causing death.

"The trial is of national importance," Mr Strickland said.

"The public importance is more poignant when the citizen is Indigenous."
Acting for Mr Rolfe, Bret Walker SC argued the prosecutor's special leave to appeal against part of the officer's defence risked fragmenting the criminal process.

"This is a good, by which we mean egregious, example of threatened fragmentation of the criminal process ... that this court would tend strongly against," he said.

The barrister labelled the fact Mr Rolfe might be acquitted "not a reason crying out for special leave to appeal".

His trial has been pushed back multiple times.

In August, the High Court agreed to a stay of proceedings pending the determination of his defence.

The case was dealt a further delay the following month when the Northern Territory Supreme Court judge overseeing it announced his retirement.

Readers seeking support can contact Lifeline crisis support on 13 11 14, visit lifeline.org.au or find an Aboriginal Medical Service here. Resources for young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders can be found at Headspace: Yarn Safe.


Share
3 min read

Published

Source: AAP, SBS


Share this with family and friends


Get SBS News daily and direct to your Inbox

Sign up now for the latest news from Australia and around the world direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Download our apps
SBS News
SBS Audio
SBS On Demand

Listen to our podcasts
An overview of the day's top stories from SBS News
Interviews and feature reports from SBS News
Your daily ten minute finance and business news wrap with SBS Finance Editor Ricardo Gonçalves.
A daily five minute news wrap for English learners and people with disability
Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS
SBS World News

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service
Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world