SKIP TO MAIN CONTENT

High Court reprieve for MRRT

The High Court has upheld the legality of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax but a coalition election victory means it will be speedily abolished

High Court to rule on MRRT
The High Court will deliver its verdict on the legality of the government's MRRT on Wednesday.

3 min read

Published

Updated

Source: AAP


Skip to article content

The High Court has thrown out a challenge to Labor's mining profits tax but it could be a short reprieve for the controversial measure.

The coalition plans to abolish the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) if elected.

"The mining tax will be gone as of July 1 next year if you vote for the coalition," Opposition leader Tony Abbott vowed on the campaign trail in Adelaide.

The legal challenge against the tax was launched by Fortescue Metals Group and four subsidiaries, backed by big mining states Western Australia and Queensland.

Fortescue, which hasn't paid any MRRT and doesn't expect to for years, argued the tax differed in each state because of varying rates of state royalties, contravening constitutional requirements that taxes be levied uniformly across the nation.

News that makes sense

Your trusted source for staying up-to-date with the world around you. Get free daily news updates and analysis, straight to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

But High Court judges unanimously disagreed.

The Labor government said the MRRT was constitutionally sound.

"It ensures Australians will receive a fair return from the nation's iron ore and coal resources into the future," Treasurer Chris Bowen and Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said.

The MRRT operated in the same manner as the quarter-century old Petroleum Resource Rent Tax which had raised more than $28 billion, Mr Bowen and Mr Dreyfus said.

"By contrast, Tony Abbott wants to hand out a tax break to mining companies and pay for it by ripping away tax cuts for small businesses and making $70 billion in budget cuts."

Fortescue, which must pay the costs of the case, was disappointed.

Chief executive Nev Power said Fortescue had challenged the MRRT because it was an unreasonable intrusion into state responsibilities, also unfair, discriminatory and complex.

The mining industry already paid more tax, including company tax and state royalties, than any other sector, with Fortescue expecting to pay $1.5 billion in 2013-14 and $2 billion in coming years.

He said objections to the MRRT were borne out by the small amount of revenue collected by the tax.

It produced just $200 million in its first year and $700 million in the second - well down on forecasts.

Mr Power wants the coalition to scrap the MRRT, as does Queensland Attorney General Jarrod Bleijie who described it as a failed cash grab.

"It was important to intervene in the case because we could not sit back and let the federal government indiscriminately tax the people of Queensland," he told AAP.

"Mining is one of the four pillars of the Queensland economy."

Australian Greens leader Christine Milne said the government should change the tax so it raises more money.

"It is flawed. It's not raising any money. Rio Tinto didn't pay any in the June quarter. How ridiculous is that?"


Get SBS News straight to your inbox

Sign up now for daily news from Australia and around the world. You can also subscribe to Insight's weekly newsletter for in-depth features and first-person stories.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Follow SBS News

Download our apps

Listen to our podcasts

Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service

Stream now

Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world