The lawyer for the US soldier suspected of killing 16 Afghan civilians has questioned the quality of the evidence against his client and says he will travel to Afghanistan to gather his own.
John Henry Browne said he met with Robert Bales for 11 hours over two days at Fort Leavenworth, where his client is being held. He added that there was still a lot he didn't know about the March 11 shootings.
"I don't know about the evidence in this case. I don't know that the government is going to prove much. There's no forensic evidence. There's no confessions," Browne said outside his hotel near the post.
"I'm certainly not saying that we're not taking responsibility for this in the right way, at the right time. But for now, I'm interested in what the evidence is," he said. "It's not like a crime scene in the United States."
Browne said there were legal, social and political issues linked to the case and how it will be prosecuted. "The war's on trial. I'm not putting the war on trial," he said. "I'm not putting the war on trial, but the war is on trial."
Bales, 38, has not been charged yet. Browne expects that he will be charged this week. The killings sparked protests in Afghanistan, endangered relations between the two countries and threatened to upend American policy over the decade-old war.
Browne met with his client behind bars for the first time on Monday to begin building a defence.
On Tuesday, Browne described Bales as "a soldier's soldier" who followed orders, including deploying to Afghanistan despite not wanting to go. Bales has been reported to have had financial troubles.
"That doesn't mean anything. Sure, there are financial problems. I have financial problems. Ninety-nine per cent of America has financial problem," he said. "You don't go kill women and children because you have financial problems."
Browne has said Bales has a sketchy memory of events from before and after the killings but recalls very little or nothing of the time the military believes he went on a shooting spree through two Afghan villages.
"He has some memories of before the incident and he has some memories of after the incident. In between, very little," Browne said.
Brown said there were potential mental health issues for his client, but that he didn't have expertise to make a qualified judgment.
"Dragging parts of bodies around is not something that really you forget very often," he said. "He's in shock."
Browne, a lawyer who defended serial killer Ted Bundy and a thief known as the "Barefoot Bandit", has said he has handled three or four military cases. The defence team includes a military defence lawyer, Major Thomas Hurley.
After their investigation, military lawyers could present charges to a commander, who then makes a judgment on whether there is probable cause to believe that an offence was committed and that the accused committed it.
That commander then submits the charges to a convening authority, who typically is the commander of the brigade to which the accused is assigned but could be of higher rank.
Share
