Prosecution of whistleblower Bernard Collaery pushed back to 2022 with no trial date set

The prosecution of whistleblower Bernard Collaery is due to enter its fourth year and entail a possible High Court challenge with no trial date in sight.

Lawyer Bernard Collaery addresses the media outside the Supreme Court in Canberra, Tuesday, 6 August, 2019.

Lawyer Bernard Collaery addresses the media outside the Supreme Court in Canberra, Tuesday, 6 August, 2019. Source: AAP

The prosecution of whistleblower Bernard Collaery has been pushed back to February 2022, ensuring the case enters its fourth year with no trial date set.

Mr Collaery did not attend court on Wednesday as procedural elements of his case were worked out by lawyers appearing predominantly over videolink.

Former attorney-general Christian Porter gave the green light for prosecution to start in 2018, with Mr Collaery accused of unlawfully sharing classified information about the alleged bugging operation of the East Timor prime minister by Australian officials in 2004.

Current Attorney-General Michaelia Cash has continued the prosecution and appealed to the High Court to keep a judge's ruling secret.
The judgment from ACT Chief Justice Helen Murrell which the Commonwealth is trying to stop being published in full derided the prosecution for seeking to have a trial conducted in secret.

An initial push to not have the judgment published was refused.

Chief Justice Murrell ruled closing the case to the public would damage confidence in the justice system with open courts standing as a bulwark against possible political prosecutions.

Her judgment on the ruling has not yet been published in full with the Attorney-General's Department arguing the information in the judgment is likely to prejudice national security.
Supporters of lawyer Bernard Collaery and 'Witness K' stage a protest outside the Supreme Court in Canberra.
Supporters of lawyer Bernard Collaery and 'Witness K' stage a protest outside the Supreme Court in Canberra. Source: AAP
In its High Court submission, first obtained by the Human Rights Law Centre, the attorney-general argues classified information in the judgment would be made public.

HRLC senior lawyer Kieran Pender pointed to the irony of trying to keep a judgment advocating for an open court behind closed doors.

"Rather than appealing the secrecy of a judgment that said no to secrecy to the High Court, the Attorney-General should drop the prosecution and fix our broken whistleblower laws," he said.

"Whistleblowers should be protected, not punished, and certainly not dragged through an endless, opaque prosecution.

"Changes to Australia's whistleblowing laws are long overdue and that reform, rather than the prosecution of whistleblowers, should be the Attorney-General's priority."


Share
2 min read

Published

Source: AAP, SBS


Share this with family and friends


Get SBS News daily and direct to your Inbox

Sign up now for the latest news from Australia and around the world direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Download our apps
SBS News
SBS Audio
SBS On Demand

Listen to our podcasts
An overview of the day's top stories from SBS News
Interviews and feature reports from SBS News
Your daily ten minute finance and business news wrap with SBS Finance Editor Ricardo Gonçalves.
A daily five minute news wrap for English learners and people with disability
Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS
SBS World News

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service
Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world