Donald Sterling on Tuesday vowed to fight the NBA's "illegal" efforts to terminate his ownership of the Los Angeles Clippers.
Sterling met the NBA's deadline for a response to its charge of racist conduct detrimental to the league, saying the recording of his racially-charged remarks that ignited a firestorm in April were illegally made and can't be used to expel him from the league.
In his letter to the league, posted in full online by USA Today and The Los Angeles Times, Sterling says he's received offers of more than $US2.5 billion ($A2.7 billion) for the team, but says a forced sale would result in an "egregious" tax burden for him and his family.
Sterling says that his remarks about African Americans were made in a private conversation with girlfriend V Stiviano, and that recording them without his knowledge was a crime under California law.
"This was an argument between a jealous man and the woman he loved that should never have left the privacy of the living room," Sterling says.
NBA commissioner Adam Silver banned Sterling for life from NBA facilities and activities and fined him $2.5 million after the comments were made public via the gossip website TMZ in April.
Silver called for Sterling to be stripped of his ownership of the club - something that requires a vote of three-quarters of the remaining 29 owners.
NBA spokesman Mike Bass said the league had received responses from both Donald Sterling and his wife, Shelly Sterling, on Tuesday, and a hearing on the matter of terminating the current ownership interests of the Clippers remained scheduled for June 3.
On May 20, the league spelled out its position that Donald Sterling's actions - in the recorded conversation and in his response to the scandal - "significantly undermine the NBA's efforts to promote diversity and inclusion, damage the NBA's relationship with its fans, harm NBA owners, players and Clippers team personnel and impair the NBA's relationship with marketing and merchandising partners, as well as with government and community leaders."
In his formal response Sterling said the league had over-reached itself.
"We do not believe a court in the United States of America will enforce the draconian penalties imposed on Mr Sterling in these circumstances, and indeed, we believe that preservation of Mr. Sterling's constitutional rights requires that these sham proceedings be terminated in Mr. Sterling's favour," Sterling's response said.
The league has maintained it has grounds to terminate his ownership "under several provisions of the NBA constitution and related agreements", although Sterling disputed that in his response.
Share
