Will Donald Trump finally end the Russia-Ukraine war? These issues are in the way

Unresolved sticking points between Russia and Ukraine have so far prevented a breakthrough, leaving prospects for a ceasefire uncertain. As Donald Trump renews his push to mediate, the question remains: can he succeed this time?

A composite of Donald Trump pointing on the right and a house destroyed by an airstrike surrounded by rubble on the left.

Donald Trump has said there is a good chance he could meet with the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, following what he said were "good talks" between his envoy and Vladimir Putin. Source: AAP

Russia has announced plans for an imminent meeting between United States President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

It followed Trump saying there was "a good chance" he could meet with his Russian counterpart soon, as he seeks to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine war.

The Kremlin said that a meeting between the US and Russian presidents was set for the "coming days".

The announcement came two days before a deadline set by Trump for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy believes the chances of a ceasefire with Russia are improving, but experts have told SBS News the war won't be resolved easily.

What have world leaders been saying?

Trump has been putting pressure on Russia to withdraw from Ukraine since taking office in January.

The New York Times reported Trump told European leaders during a call that he intended to meet with Putin and then follow up with a three-way meeting with the Russian leader and Zelenskyy.

Trump has not officially met with Putin in person since his first term, but that could change.

"There's a good chance that there will be a meeting very soon," Trump told reporters.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: "The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the president is open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelenskyy."

Face-to-face talks between Trump and Putin could happen as soon as next week, a White House official said.
Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said on Thursday in a statement that, at the suggestion of the US, "an agreement has been reached in principle to hold a bilateral summit in the coming days".

Ushakov said details were now being worked out and that a venue had also been agreed to "in principle", with next week set as a target date.

The announcements followed a meeting between Putin and US special envoy Steve Witkoff, which Trump described as having achieved "great progress" in a Truth Social post.

A Kremlin aide said the talks were "useful and constructive".

Zelenskyy said he believed the US applying pressure on Russia to end the war was working, and that Russia was now more "inclined" to a ceasefire.

"The pressure on them works. But the main thing is that they do not deceive us in the details — neither us nor the US," Zelenskyy said in his nightly address.

Later speaking with the leaders of France and Germany along with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, he said Europe must be involved in the peace process.

What do we know about Trump and Putin's relationship?

While Zelenskyy appears hopeful of an end to the war, a Russian foreign and security policy expert said any meeting could just be a "vague promise", with no substantial outcomes.

Associate professor Matthew Sussex from the Australian National University's Centre for European studies, said Trump and Putin's relationship appears steady, despite the tensions between the US and Russia over the ongoing war in Ukraine.

"In spite of Trump's apparent frustrations with Putin, he continues to show him extraordinary deference, and for whatever reason seems unwilling to put serious pressure on him," he said.

"Putin clearly recognises that, and is fairly comfortable he can continue stringing him along with vague promises of meetings and summits."
Three rounds of Russia-Ukraine talks in Istanbul have failed to make headway on a ceasefire, with both sides remaining far apart in their demands.

Sussex expressed doubt that any talks next week would produce tangible results, expecting them to be largely superficial.

"These 'talks' will therefore do three things: help Putin kick the can down the road; get Trump out of the cul-de-sac he created by issuing 'ultimatums' to Putin; and put pressure back on Ukraine and Europe to accept a peace largely on Russian terms," he said.

Ukraine has targeted Russian refineries and energy facilities with drone strikes, while Russia has concentrated its air assault on Ukrainian cities.

'Nil prospect' of a quick resolution to the war

Several key points have repeatedly hindered previous talks aimed at ending the Russia-Ukraine war.

A major obstacle is what happens to the land Russia now occupies in Ukraine.

"There is nil prospect of resolving the war by next week," Sussex said.

"Trump and Putin can't resolve the territory issue, for the simple reason that Ukraine is excluded from those discussions, justifiably mistrusts the US, and has no incentive to agree to ceding large swathes of its land if it doesn't have a seat at the table."
A colourful map of Crimea, with Ukraine and Russia on either side.
The ancestral ownership of Crimea, along with its city of Sevastopol, is another sticking point between Russia and Ukraine.
Sussex said talks that do not include Europe or Zelenskyy would ultimately lead to Ukraine being pressured to accept peace on Russia's terms.

"Zelenskyy is important, but the onus for the instigation of peace talks has always been on Russia as the invader. Put simply, Russia can stop the war tomorrow by withdrawing its troops. And in any case, it would be hard to find another Ukrainian who didn't have contempt for Putin," he said.

Who would guarantee peace?

While an end to the war next week may seem far-fetched, peace in the region has been a clear policy goal for Trump, who had boasted he could end the conflict within 24 hours of taking office, though he later walked back those remarks.

Jessica Genauer, a senior lecturer in international relations at Flinders University, told SBS News that ensuring a lasting peace would be yet another challenge.

Genauer said questions remain about who would guarantee that no-one will violate any future borders between Russia and Ukraine.
"Who would ensure stability on a shared border between Ukraine and Russia under any such future agreement? Would this be a NATO force? This is very unlikely," she said.

"Would there be an international peacekeeping force? Also, unlikely.

"It may be that the conflict freezes without any formal peace agreement and remains in a frozen state along the lines of the North Korean-South Korean conflict for many years to come."


For the latest from SBS News, download our app and subscribe to our newsletter.

Share
6 min read

Published

By Cameron Carr
Source: SBS News


Share this with family and friends


Get SBS News daily and direct to your Inbox

Sign up now for the latest news from Australia and around the world direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you agree to SBS’s terms of service and privacy policy including receiving email updates from SBS.

Download our apps
SBS News
SBS Audio
SBS On Demand

Listen to our podcasts
An overview of the day's top stories from SBS News
Interviews and feature reports from SBS News
Your daily ten minute finance and business news wrap with SBS Finance Editor Ricardo Gonçalves.
A daily five minute news wrap for English learners and people with disability
Get the latest with our News podcasts on your favourite podcast apps.

Watch on SBS
SBS World News

SBS World News

Take a global view with Australia's most comprehensive world news service
Watch the latest news videos from Australia and across the world